Re: Number validation issue

References	(2 earlier) <CAO+9iGc5bmp9iNveDQ7Bc_LcDDTX6o0rZdr8vHi1aNxYm6go5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ2vgs76po_3JiuqGtLH3b=bP-U1TW-mYYtkxeU-bbx7Z2oHhw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ2vgs4YvQ+RcKMjEnSimRE3pv3QYbuHuSeHfnU703w1QJr5Ew@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ2vgs5oX0Oxt++K8v8qHdB46ewpoLKQ9QxQX5P3u_NvypFM7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ2vgs7yy27HhidfKCkGbqmBUtfB_dx0s_m9xK8x-ETFKjJd+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From	Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date	2013-02-22 11:50 -0700
Subject	Re: Number validation issue
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2296.1361559056.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Morten Engvoldsen
<mortenengv@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Just to make it more clear: I am looking for how to generate the weight in :
> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7..  format for any
> length of number instead of
>
> weights = [5, 4, 3, 2, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
>
> only for fixed digit.
>
> My below code can check only for 9 digit, so if we provide a number of more
> than 9 digit, it is not able to check that number. Hope, this makes clear
> what i am looking for...

It sounds like you probably should generate the list of weights at
run-time rather than hard-coding it as a literal.  Have you tried
this?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Number validation issue Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-22 11:50 -0700

csiph-web