Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #3001

Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <debatem1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.033
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; '(although': 0.05; 'ah,': 0.09; 'arithmetic': 0.09; 'counting': 0.09; 'that!': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.11; '>>>': 0.12; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'arithmetic,': 0.16; 'arithmetic.': 0.16; 'better?': 0.16; 'division,': 0.16; 'subject:versus': 0.16; 'mathematics': 0.16; 'subject:] ': 0.16; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.22; 'e.g.': 0.22; 'mon,': 0.22; 'url:wiki': 0.24; "didn't": 0.25; '(e.g.': 0.26; 'demonstrate': 0.26; 'statement': 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'looks': 0.28; 'least': 0.30; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.31; 'do.': 0.31; 'forms.': 0.31; 'fact': 0.31; 'bit': 0.33; 'fairly': 0.33; 'on,': 0.33; 'operations': 0.33; 'actually': 0.34; 'there': 0.35; 'difficult': 0.35; 'url:en': 0.35; '-0700,': 0.35; 'instances': 0.35; 'received:209.85.216.46': 0.35; 'received:mail- qw0-f46.google.com': 0.35; 'subject:software': 0.35; 'surprised': 0.35; 'rather': 0.36; 'getting': 0.36; 'case,': 0.36; "we're": 0.37; 'some': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'apr': 0.38; 'consistent': 0.38; 'steven': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'url:org': 0.38; 'so,': 0.38; 'where': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'how': 0.39; 'would': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'further': 0.62; '2011': 0.62; 'prove': 0.65; 'utilize': 0.67; 'deal.': 0.68; 'subject:Free': 0.72; '11,': 0.77; '4000': 0.84; 'remarkably': 0.84; 'wonderful!': 0.84; 'factors': 0.91; 'obvious,': 0.91; 'spell': 0.91; 'trail': 0.91; 'workout': 0.91; 'checker': 0.93; 'absolutely': 0.98
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7ra++5Mm1w6rFo5agNGeOVss/QSooCowqBqPmF8+cAI=; b=MgPc24TvNbE76C/6BlBmYVNUsGobkWrG8gTU1wYmZMOe9xPUkbel8csUjhKvfaTY+f dDkOhaXdHR0Nt6kTbzmJkMEfU/g0W2QLDgpaFzviXSjOvnCYL7BtC+HQlGse2MAZn903 gL47HbYyIIWUI1V7Le3+UvcILEsLY81NpaNq4=
DomainKey-Signature a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=nneWV8SXF9N8lGwRvBFKekxGPXdCKCfMTl4UoBhrmhoBcbNa7tqlXo2A5tQp9md+ia 8UubOpKCzKw/DZu/gyEx5kyKToMJlKfLvaYpr9VGi8z6OkSzWKnQEDtmLVtZRhTzTjKw wJuekfDFIAmWl4kVjfJZfgcHQ50DMllWxLGzU=
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <4da380a4$0$29982$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
References <mailman.65.1302065189.9059.python-list@python.org> <t7Vmp.7632$zn.3197@newsfe19.iad> <mailman.72.1302078388.9059.python-list@python.org> <4d9c5ca5$0$29991$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87tyebf3r3.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au> <_Abnp.8356$zn.729@newsfe19.iad> <4d9d6587$0$29992$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <OHlnp.10535$g56.5872@newsfe04.iad> <mailman.121.1302206148.9059.python-list@python.org> <__top.14604$zn.8052@newsfe19.iad> <mailman.209.1302508440.9059.python-list@python.org> <4da2c58a$0$29965$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.223.1302545833.9059.python-list@python.org> <4da380a4$0$29982$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Date Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:55:37 -0700
Subject Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents
From geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com>
To "Steven D'Aprano" <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.229.1302562540.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 53
NNTP-Posting-Host 82.94.164.166
X-Trace 1302562540 news.xs4all.nl 81483 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:38463
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3001

Show key headers only | View raw

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:17:09 -0700, geremy condra wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Steven D'Aprano
>> <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
> [...]
>>> Of course, some mathematics is obvious, or at least intuitive (although
>>> proving it rigorously can be remarkably difficult -- after 4000 years
>>> of maths, we still don't have an absolutely bullet-proof proof that
>>> 1+1=2).
>>
>> Erm. This is getting a bit far afield, but yes, we do. The statement you
>> provide above part of Presbuger arithmetic, which is both complete and
>> decidable.
>
> Ah, I didn't know that! How wonderful! But in any case, Presburger
> arithmetic is much weaker than even Peano arithmetic.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presburger_arithmetic
>
> So, let me re-phrase my statement... in any realistically complex
> arithmetic that is consistent with operations performed for real-world
> applications (e.g. multiplication, division, exponentiation, ...), one
> cannot demonstrate a bullet-proof proof of 1+1=2. Better? :)

Well, Peano arithmetic is normal, everyday arithmetic fully
axiomatized, and Presburger arithmetic is a subset of it, so we can
utilize the fact that 1 + 1 = 2 is provable in Presburger arithmetic
(damn is my spell checker getting a workout on this sentence) to prove
it in Peano arithmetic, and therefore in everyday use.

You'd also be surprised what you can do with some limited arithmetic
forms. During my undergrad I spent some time writing a Presburger
prover that was actually fairly handy- there are definitely instances
where trading multiplication by non-constant factors for provability
superpowers is a good deal.

> Presburger arithmetic, Peano arithmetic, the Axiom of Choice... we're
> getting further and further away from "natural" mathematics, e.g.
> counting sheep in a field.

Yes, the sheep would much rather hear about patent reform than the
axiom of choice ;)

<snip>

> Anyway, this is now getting off-topic even for the original off-topic
> post. Time to move on, methinks.

Yeah, looks like a good time to let this one trail off.

Geremy Condra

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Python benefits over Cobra Brendan Simon <Brendan@BrendanSimon.com> - 2011-04-06 14:40 +1000
  Re: Python benefits over Cobra harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-06 03:03 -0500
    Re: Python benefits over Cobra Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-06 18:26 +1000
      Re: Python benefits over Cobra Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-06 12:29 +0000
        Re: Python benefits over Cobra Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-06 23:06 +1000
        [OT] Free software versus software idea patents (was: Python benefits over Cobra) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-07 07:50 +1000
          Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-07 00:03 -0500
            Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-07 07:19 +0000
              Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-07 11:33 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-04-07 17:15 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-08 05:55 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-10 21:49 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 00:53 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 01:36 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-12 03:53 -0500
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-04-12 13:32 -0400
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 11:44 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-04-12 15:39 -0400
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-11 09:10 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 11:17 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-11 22:28 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 15:55 -0700
                Re: [even more OT than before] Arithmetic [was Free software versus software idea patents] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-12 11:34 +0000
                Re: [even more OT than before] Arithmetic [was Free software versus software idea patents] geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 11:11 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-12 10:02 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-12 03:15 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 09:54 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-14 00:35 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-13 23:36 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-14 02:22 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 09:51 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-16 00:21 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 23:46 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Algis Kabaila <akabaila@pcug.org.au> - 2011-04-16 21:01 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-16 23:36 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-17 10:31 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-16 18:35 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-18 01:29 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 00:34 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-04-12 13:43 -0400
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-12 23:56 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 17:05 -0700
          Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents (was: Python benefits over Cobra) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-07 07:39 +0000
            Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents (was: Python benefits over Cobra) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 18:17 +1000
              Re: Free software versus software idea patents (was: Python benefits over Cobra) flebber <flebber.crue@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 03:51 -0700
            Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-07 10:31 -0500
              Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2011-04-07 11:50 -0400
              Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> - 2011-04-07 13:55 -0400
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-07 14:37 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-08 01:30 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-08 01:37 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-09 23:55 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-10 19:04 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 10:18 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-10 20:48 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-10 21:01 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 11:26 -0600
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-12 04:22 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 06:59 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 10:48 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 11:13 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 15:56 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-14 00:50 -0500
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-13 23:38 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-14 02:29 -0500
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-04-14 08:42 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 09:48 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-15 23:27 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 13:37 -0600
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-12 23:45 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-14 01:04 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 19:15 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-14 14:02 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 00:11 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 13:46 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-15 02:21 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-04-14 22:52 -0400
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 13:50 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-04-14 21:36 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 08:01 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-04-14 22:13 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-15 01:51 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 15:23 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-04-14 22:55 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-15 02:09 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 12:31 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-04-14 22:43 -0400
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-04-14 14:20 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 02:28 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 10:49 -0600
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 13:51 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 15:05 -0600
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 03:31 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-08 01:41 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-08 07:14 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-04-08 09:10 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2011-04-09 07:45 +0100
            Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents (was: Python benefits over Cobra) Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-04-07 14:18 -0400
            Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-10 11:53 +1000
            Re: Free software versus software idea patents (was: Python benefits over Cobra) sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-04-12 09:04 -0700
      Re: Python benefits over Cobra harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-07 00:25 -0500
        Re: Python benefits over Cobra Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-07 06:43 +0000

csiph-web