Re: Generarl programming question.

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; '(at': 0.04; 'allowed.': 0.07; 'discard': 0.07; 'variables': 0.07; 'calls.': 0.09; 'function,': 0.09; 'namespace': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'stack.': 0.09; 'to)': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'stored': 0.12; 'basic.': 0.16; 'called.': 0.16; 'indirect,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:programming': 0.16; 'subject:question.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'mechanism': 0.19; 'stack': 0.19; 'written': 0.21; 'proposed': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'versions': 0.24; 'least': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'function': 0.29; 'chris': 0.29; 'needed.': 0.30; "skip:' 10": 0.31; 'usually': 0.31; 'overhead': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'another': 0.32; 'implemented': 0.33; 'actual': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'objects': 0.35; 'test': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; 'functions.': 0.36; 'words,': 0.36; 'thank': 0.38; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'called': 0.40; 'space': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'most': 0.60; 'matter': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'times': 0.62; 'teaching': 0.64; 'thomas': 0.65; 'direct': 0.67; 'believe': 0.68; 'paper': 0.75; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'recursion,': 0.84; 'sheet': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject	Re: Generarl programming question.
Date	Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:47:51 -0400
References	<dcb7fd6b-3a96-47e8-91f6-49b21f7bf605@googlegroups.com> <mailman.222.1428765309.12925.python-list@python.org> <12030326.cc9aoE7jz1@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	pool-98-114-97-173.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
In-Reply-To	<12030326.cc9aoE7jz1@PointedEars.de>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.20
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.227.1428778121.12925.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	32
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1428778121 news.xs4all.nl 2931 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42099
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:88836

Show key headers only | View raw

On 4/11/2015 12:23 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> The 'x' inside each function is completely separate, no matter how
>> many times they get called. They're usually stored on something called
>> a "call stack" - you put another sheet of paper on top of the stack
>> every time you call a function, local variables are all written on
>> that paper, and when you return from a function, you discard the top
>> sheet and see what's underneath.
>
> Thank you for that description; I shall use it from now on when teaching
> laymen about the call stack.

What Chris is describing is one local namespace (sheet of paper) per 
function *call*.  In early Fortran (at least the first version I used), 
there was one local namespace (sheet) per *function*.  The call stack 
was a stack of (pointers to) functions.  While a function object was in 
use (after a call, before the return), it could not be called again.  In 
other words, recursion, direct or indirect, was not allowed.  I believe 
the same was (is?) true of some versions of BASIC.

It has been proposed that Python use a hybrid model.  Function objects 
would have space for local variables for the first call, but there would 
also be a mechanism to allocate additional 'sheets' for recursive calls. 
  The idea is that most functions are not called recursively, so the 
overhead of allocating and freeing the per-call space is usually not 
needed.  I do not believe that anyone has implemented the idea to test 
feasibility and the actual speedup in relation to the additional complexity.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Thread

Generarl programming question. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-04-11 08:00 -0700
  Re: Generarl programming question. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-12 01:15 +1000
    Re: Generarl programming question. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-04-11 08:22 -0700
      Re: Generarl programming question. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-12 01:28 +1000
    Re: Generarl programming question. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-04-11 18:23 +0200
      Re: Generarl programming question. Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-04-11 14:47 -0400
        Re: Generarl programming question. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-04-11 21:19 +0200
          Re: Generarl programming question. Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-04-11 17:12 -0400
            Re: Generarl programming question. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-04-12 00:05 +0200
              Re: Generarl programming question. Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-12 15:04 +1000
  Re: Generarl programming question. Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-12 01:25 +1000
    Re: Generarl programming question. jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2015-04-11 08:36 -0700

csiph-web