Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #6609
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.006 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'socket': 0.04; 'concurrently': 0.07; 'subject:process': 0.07; 'accidentally': 0.09; 'sockets': 0.09; 'this:': 0.10; 'linux': 0.11; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; "(i'd": 0.16; 'angelico': 0.16; 'compare.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'handshake': 0.16; 'other)': 0.16; 'side.': 0.16; 'simplicity,': 0.16; 'subject:sending': 0.16; 'mon,': 0.17; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.21; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.23; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.23; 'weight': 0.23; '(or': 0.24; 'byte': 0.25; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'random': 0.28; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'chris': 0.34; 'light': 0.34; 'probably': 0.36; 'connection': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'something': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'ways': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'run': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'unix': 0.40; 'really': 0.40; 'simply': 0.60; 'kind': 0.60; 'best': 0.60; 'your': 0.60; 'waiting': 0.61; 'huge': 0.62; 'alert': 0.65; 'further': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'fan': 0.66; 'guarantee': 0.72; '30,': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9Dv9CxotLUtxjUIzKsg1QuliQ3oLMEH59VIbRY8Mnfg=; b=jJ7119kJ4DrGem48dl+ZJJnggaka59S5SAoB7mVmjDXFqGrJ39xZYLezuWFumv1Ks8 c2MtDDqyiLDkCJT5fwq+xfBMPziBi+TxiimQOTEPaLwTDqApn4b0mL/NfpX/fa0I1fIW oJ3z8S/t2pF1IFamy50wCoZloELX1KokIwG/s= |
| DomainKey-Signature | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=e/oby8MSvZ1jHow/a6K2UeVe8aF1pzhYXCYPCMtPA7A4HZ09UwSSl9wdL7ewjpKfYG o005ydWrr+85DnB2DJCp/aRNGEunXxeDcnsYz6xcGqxxbpW29vk1eM9p3pwnu/pwyo7c wgrrjVa96jzLFdUfBsTm85pG/HSHJc/1Au768= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <irusph1cdd@news3.newsguy.com> |
| References | <4de183e7$0$26108$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <irusph1cdd@news3.newsguy.com> |
| Date | Mon, 30 May 2011 12:03:21 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: portable way of sending notifying a process |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2247.1306721004.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 25 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 82.94.164.166 |
| X-Trace | 1306721005 news.xs4all.nl 49176 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:48654 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:6609 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Chris Torek <nospam@torek.net> wrote: >>What would be a light weight portable way, that one process can tell >>another to do something? >> >>The main requirement would be to have no CPU impact while waiting (thus >>no polling) > > Your best bet here is probably to use sockets. Both systems have > ways to create service sockets and to connect to a socket as a > client. Further to this: If your two processes are going to start up, then run concurrently for some time, and during that time alert each other (or one alerts the other) frequently, a socket is an excellent choice. Use a TCP socket on Windows, and either a TCP socket or a Unix socket on Linux (I'd just use TCP on both for simplicity, but Unix sockets are faster), and simply write a byte to it whenever you want to alert the other side. You can largely guarantee that no other process can accidentally or maliciously wake you, as long as you have some kind of one-off handshake on connection - even something really simple like sending a random nonce, having the other end send hash(nonce + password), and compare. Chris Angelico Huge fan of TCP sockets (hello MUDs!)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
portable way of sending notifying a process News123 <news1234@free.fr> - 2011-05-29 01:23 +0200
Re: portable way of sending notifying a process Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-05-29 00:09 -0700
Re: portable way of sending notifying a process Chris Torek <nospam@torek.net> - 2011-05-30 01:44 +0000
Re: portable way of sending notifying a process Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-30 12:03 +1000
Re: portable way of sending notifying a process News123 <news1234@free.fr> - 2011-05-30 11:18 +0200
csiph-web