Re: scope of function parameters

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.058
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.88; 'S': 0.00; 'debug': 0.03; 'foo': 0.09; 'subject:parameters': 0.09; 'am,': 0.14; 'debugging': 0.14; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.14; 'received:mail- iw0-f174.google.com': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; '"hey': 0.16; 'angelico': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'guys,': 0.16; 'is"': 0.16; 'it".': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; 'seconds': 0.16; 'mon,': 0.17; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'assume': 0.23; 'module,': 0.23; "i'm": 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'problem': 0.28; 'received:209.85.214': 0.28; 'url:article': 0.29; 'unable': 0.30; 'article.': 0.30; 'boss,': 0.30; 'solved': 0.30; "can't": 0.32; 'agree': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'post': 0.33; 'with.': 0.33; 'list': 0.33; "isn't": 0.33; 'page.': 0.33; "i'll": 0.34; 'chris': 0.34; 'quite': 0.36; 'joe': 0.36; 'difference': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'something': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'mailing': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'linked': 0.38; 'media,': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'explain': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'list,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'worth': 0.60; 'phone': 0.63; 'url:s': 0.63; 'fan': 0.66; 'billion': 0.67; 'crash': 0.67; 'boss': 0.73; 'fortune': 0.73; 'ring': 0.73; 'thousand': 0.74; 'million': 0.77; 'demo': 0.77; 'ship': 0.78; '30,': 0.84; '11:31': 0.84; 'bull': 0.84; 'session,': 0.84; 'url:print': 0.84; 'standards.': 0.91
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oxgc7o4JxaOCu2PLIIo8DcWK4qhMVRwdjEncPtgWfeE=; b=VPImIrRaxi4qaHW7vxpP0baVNOa2VkgjfJA4eN6TRrNV5KGx7leUHDuPkK8GFt72nD ynoMF1AQr83Ct+Ld2Hy02+tHNzqAtnpA6XRkyLVOym73OPWnfse1bBDS6Rh+IDkmNcKT PhuiDi9ZnRU4mzNyb4z42Ft9KIYZo0CaORHOw=
DomainKey-Signature	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YLUA8iU5Gjips55WvfGmpOvwvOwuK7yL8MKsmGM4BSQ9RmIetDLICDEYC1aL6ENuHi 8rZTbrEI0qP8S8gNNfE0W1qfzsHbLbY5fEo5gOJDH9KdESAWiMeLmxsQjE1bC2THGpnn F1E7/b/cufo4oAbjbThLbz+/SF8KfVCZsRPGk=
MIME-Version	1.0
In-Reply-To	<87pqn17z4a.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
References	<mailman.2216.1306661462.9059.python-list@python.org> <4de2dab8$0$29996$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87pqn17z4a.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
Date	Mon, 30 May 2011 11:56:27 +1000
Subject	Re: scope of function parameters
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To	python-list@python.org
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.12
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2246.1306720590.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	26
NNTP-Posting-Host	82.94.164.166
X-Trace	1306720590 news.xs4all.nl 49048 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:56285
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:6608

Show key headers only | View raw

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
>  <URL:http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/93903/I_m_OK_The_Bull_Is_Dead>

I agree with the gist of that. My take on this is: When I'm talking to
my boss, I always assume that the phone will ring ten seconds into my
explanation. Ten seconds is enough for "Dad, I'm OK; the bull is
dead", it's enough for "I've solved Problem X, we can move on now";
it's enough for "Foo is crashing, can't ship till I debug it". If
fortune is smiling on me and the phone isn't ringing, I can explain
that Problem X was the reason Joe was unable to demo his new module,
or that the crash in Foo is something that I know I'll be able to pin
down in a one-day debugging session, but even if I don't, my boss
knows enough to keep going with.

Of course, there's a significant difference between a mailing list
post and a detailed and well copyedited article. Quite frequently I'll
ramble on list, in a way quite inappropriate to a publication that
would be linked to as a "hey guys, here's how it is" page. Different
media, different standards.

Chris Angelico
"Forty thousand million billion THEGS quotes? That must be worth a fortune!"
-- definitely a fan of THEGS --

Thread

scope of function parameters Henry Olders <henry.olders@mcgill.ca> - 2011-05-29 04:30 -0400
  Re: scope of function parameters Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-05-29 07:59 -0400
    Re: scope of function parameters Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-05-29 16:27 -0400
  Re: scope of function parameters Peter Pearson <ppearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2011-05-29 17:21 +0000
    Re: scope of function parameters Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-30 07:42 +1000
      Re: scope of function parameters Laurent Claessens <moky.math@gmail.com> - 2011-05-30 09:12 +0200
        Re: scope of function parameters Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-05-30 00:27 -0700
        Re: scope of function parameters Laurent <moky.math@gmail.com> - 2011-05-30 09:38 +0200
        Re: scope of function parameters Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> - 2011-05-30 19:10 +1100
        Re: scope of function parameters Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-05-30 05:02 -0400
          Re: scope of function parameters Laurent Claessens <moky.math@gmail.com> - 2011-05-30 11:08 +0200
            Re: scope of function parameters Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-30 09:14 +0000
            Re: scope of function parameters Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-30 19:17 +1000
            Re: scope of function parameters Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-05-30 11:41 +0200
              Re: scope of function parameters Laurent Claessens <moky.math@gmail.com> - 2011-05-30 12:10 +0200
              Re: scope of function parameters Laurent Claessens <moky.math@gmail.com> - 2011-05-30 12:10 +0200
            Re: scope of function parameters Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2011-05-30 13:40 +0300
            Re: scope of function parameters Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-05-30 12:49 -0400
        Re: scope of function parameters Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-30 09:16 +0000
  Re: scope of function parameters Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-29 23:46 +0000
    Re: scope of function parameters Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-30 11:31 +1000
      Re: scope of function parameters Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-30 11:56 +1000
        Re: scope of function parameters Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-30 12:08 +1000
          Re: scope of function parameters Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-30 12:37 +1000
      Re: scope of function parameters Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-30 04:23 +0000
  Re: scope of function parameters rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-05-31 09:46 -0700
    Re: scope of function parameters rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-05-31 10:33 -0700

csiph-web