Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #6569

Re: scope of function parameters

Show key headers only | View raw

Henry




On 2011-05-29, at 5:47 , Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote:

> On Sonntag 29 Mai 2011, Henry Olders wrote:
>> It seems that in Python, a variable inside a function is
>> global unless it's assigned.
> 
> no, they are local
> 
>> I would have thought that a function parameter would
>> automatically be considered local to the function. It doesn't
>> make sense to me to pass a global to a function as a
>> parameter.
> 
> it is local. But consider what you actually passed:
> You did not pass a copy of the list but the list itself.
> You could also say you passed a reference to the list.
> All python variables only hold a pointer (the id) to
> an object. This object has a reference count and is
> automatically deleted when there are no more references
> to it.
> 
> If you want a local copy of the list you can either
> do what you called being ugly or do just that within
> the function itself - which I think is cleaner and
> only required once.
> 
> def fnc2(c):
> 		c = c[:]
>        c[1] = 'having'
>        return c

Thank you, Wolfgang. That certainly works, but to me it is still a workaround to deal with the consequence of a particular decision. From my perspective, a function parameter should be considered as having been assigned (although the exact assignment will not be known until runtime), and as an assigned variable, it should be considered local.

Henry

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: scope of function parameters Henry Olders <henry.olders@mcgill.ca> - 2011-05-29 16:19 -0400
  Re: scope of function parameters Christopher Head <chead@is.invalid> - 2011-05-29 14:48 -0700

csiph-web