Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #46098

RE: Solving the problem of mutual recursion

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.070
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.86; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'python': 0.11; 'concurrency': 0.16; 'subject:recursion': 0.16; 'trying': 0.19; 'machine': 0.22; 'to:name:python-list@python.org': 0.22; 'load': 0.23; 'certainly': 0.24; 'received:65.55.116': 0.24; 'subject:problem': 0.24; 'looks': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'skip:- 40': 0.29; '[1]': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'run': 0.32; 'linux': 0.33; 'url:python': 0.33; 'running': 0.33; 'mac': 0.33; 'date:': 0.34; 'core': 0.34; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'no,': 0.35; 'shows': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'email addr:python.org': 0.37; 'apple': 0.38; 'solving': 0.38; 'url:library': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'subject:': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 're:': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'email name:python-list': 0.65; 'it!': 0.67; 'normal.': 0.68; '2013': 0.98
X-TMN [P7SRBhQtVue8bV4Xy5v1ZyRRIdjOdf/w]
X-Originating-Email [carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com]
From Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com>
To "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Subject RE: Solving the problem of mutual recursion
Date Sun, 26 May 2013 21:22:19 +0300
Importance Normal
In-Reply-To <074eac8a-1bc4-4fe0-afa9-1f52405f81d5@k3g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
References <074eac8a-1bc4-4fe0-afa9-1f52405f81d5@k3g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
MIME-Version 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime 26 May 2013 18:22:19.0844 (UTC) FILETIME=[F57D0840:01CE5A3D]
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2187.1369592548.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 24
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1369592548 news.xs4all.nl 15958 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49353
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:46098

Show key headers only | View raw

----------------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 11:13:12 -0700
> Subject: Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion
> From: peter.h.m.brooks@gmail.com
> To: python-list@python.org
[...]
>> How can you get 140% of CPU? IS that a typo??
>>
> No, on a multi-core machine it's normal. The machine shows python
> running multiple threads - and the number of threads change as the
> program runs. Perhaps the OS/X implementation of python does allow
> concurrency when others don't. It certainly looks like it!


I pretty sure it doesn't run on multiple cores on Linux and Windows.

I've tested it and have been trying to find a better way achieve concurrency in Python. One of the ways is the multiprocessing module[1].

Do Mac OS shows "140%" CPU load when more than a single core is been used? lol Apple sucks!!! lol


[1] http://docs.python.org/2/library/multiprocessing.html

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Solving the problem of mutual recursion Peter Brooks <peter.h.m.brooks@gmail.com> - 2013-05-26 04:49 -0700
  Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-05-26 18:09 +0300
    Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-05-26 11:23 -0400
    Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Peter Brooks <peter.h.m.brooks@gmail.com> - 2013-05-26 10:21 -0700
      RE: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-26 21:09 +0300
        Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Peter Brooks <peter.h.m.brooks@gmail.com> - 2013-05-26 11:13 -0700
          RE: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-26 21:22 +0300
            Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Peter Brooks <peter.h.m.brooks@gmail.com> - 2013-05-26 12:05 -0700
          Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-05-26 13:35 -0600
          Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-27 08:16 +1000
            Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Peter Brooks <peter.h.m.brooks@gmail.com> - 2013-05-26 21:36 -0700
              Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-05-27 00:07 -0600
              Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-27 17:37 +1000
          Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-05-27 00:19 -0600
          Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-05-27 01:04 -0600

csiph-web