Re: Is Python "venerable"?

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<gheskett@wdtv.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	UNSURE 0.381
X-Spam-Level	***
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.38; 'S': 0.14; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'oct': 0.16; 'soap,': 0.16; 'url:shtml': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'feb': 0.19; 'cheers,': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'url :non-standard http port': 0.30; 'getting': 0.33; 'defense': 0.33; 'up!': 0.33; 'wednesday': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'pm,': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'object': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1256': 0.61; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.62; 'respect': 0.63; 'url:%20': 0.63; 'harder': 0.65; 'realise': 0.65; 'url:%1': 0.68; 'born': 0.71; 'received:204': 0.72; '2013': 0.84; 'received:66.118': 0.84; 'albert': 0.91; 'mistake': 0.91; 'taught': 0.97
X-Spam-Status	No, score=-2.1 required=5.0
X-Spam-Level
From	Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com>
To	python-list@python.org
Subject	Re: Is Python "venerable"?
Date	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:33:23 -0500
References	<roy-198D2A.21455319022013@news.panix.com> <201302192310.30668.gheskett@wdtv.com> <1361358235.22846.140661194175433.21504DE1@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To	<1361358235.22846.140661194175433.21504DE1@webmail.messagingengine.com>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	Text/Plain; charset="windows-1256"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At	Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:49:18 +0100
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2178.1361461760.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	26
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1361461760 news.xs4all.nl 6938 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38767
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:39438

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wednesday 20 February 2013 10:32:14 Albert Hopkins did opine:

> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013, at 11:10 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> [...]
> 
> > And even us old (78) farts are calling things Kewl now.
> 
> 78??? Is that the year you were born or the years since you were born?
> 
> -a

Born in Oct 1934.  78yo now.

Cheers, Gene
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
My web page: <http://coyoteden.dyndns-free.com:85/gene> is up!
My views 
<http://www.armchairpatriot.com/What%20Has%20America%20Become.shtml>
Ralph's Observation:
	It is a mistake to let any mechanical object realise that you
	are in a hurry.
I was taught to respect my elders, but its getting 
harder and harder to find any...

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is Python "venerable"? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-02-19 21:45 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-02-20 03:09 +0000
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Barry W Brown <brownbar@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 19:53 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-02-20 16:03 +0000
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-19 23:03 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-20 04:15 +0000
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-20 11:28 -0800
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-02-19 23:10 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 20:42 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 09:08 +0000
      Re: Is Python "venerable"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 20:20 +1100
        Re: Is Python "venerable"? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 02:49 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-02-20 10:19 +0100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Albert Hopkins <marduk@letterboxes.org> - 2013-02-20 06:03 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 12:35 +0100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 22:45 +1100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-20 11:29 -0800
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-02-20 10:33 -0500

csiph-web