Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #96121
| Date | 2015-09-07 18:52 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> |
| Subject | Re: Wheels For ... |
| References | <mailman.181.1441560821.8327.python-list@python.org> <e2b236dd-e92d-4faf-be60-df0a044de3d4@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.217.1441711857.8327.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 06.09.2015 22:06, Ned Batchelder wrote: > As a developer of a Python package, I don't see how this would be better. > The developer would still have to get their software into some kind of > uniform configuration, so the central authority could package it. You've > moved the problem from, "everyone has to make wheels" to "everyone has to > make a tree that's structured properly." But if we can do the second > thing, the first thing is really easy. Unfortunately, I disagree with you one that and others already gave explanations why. Internally, we had this "wild-west" tree in our source as well but we moved on to a properly structured tree and it solved problems we didn't even imagine to have solved when starting this effort some years ago. Best, Sven
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Wheels For ... "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2015-09-06 19:33 +0200
Re: Wheels For ... Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-09-06 13:06 -0700
Re: Wheels For ... "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2015-09-07 18:52 +0200
csiph-web