Re: empty clause of for loops

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!storethat.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From	"Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: empty clause of for loops
Date	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:36:10 +0100
Lines	11
Message-ID	<mailman.210.1458138972.12893.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<56E93413.6090108@mail.de> <mailman.189.1458125264.12893.python-list@python.org> <E9dGy.48569$4l5.10304@fx37.am4> <mailman.203.1458136003.12893.python-list@python.org> <YDdGy.48571$4l5.24270@fx37.am4>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	news.uni-berlin.de zx76nqPatxUxWuV59Ge0UwJbncYOdMhBg3UKmnPs8sug==
Return-Path	<srkunze@mail.de>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.052
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.90; 'S': 0.00; ':-(': 0.07; 'typed': 0.09; 'guessing': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'thanks.': 0.18; 'trying': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.24; 'this.': 0.28; 'received:10.0': 0.34; 'so,': 0.35; 'best,': 0.35; 'could': 0.35; 'quite': 0.35; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'where': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'conversation': 0.84; 'intending': 0.84
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mail.de; s=mail201212; t=1458138970; bh=3kNx/kbZJMfEbMUj5JAQ23cgKUNOi4o3b+Lyh8ptl1Q=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=C4wrz9r9pX4B3UBBbYBCRcnYX3mkGchSaG41VMXtKyp0guv5tljDWGiQZr4ZhIWnU cnPmfJKR54up2C9LTrFt3LK5FNnn52Z6awYz9f2KKgCdNLHImtR9fb/mfa9s6sUcfV 2KB0o572nM/1NvaPoA8l4MXAMciis2trnyYJh0/c=
In-Reply-To	<YDdGy.48571$4l5.24270@fx37.am4>
X-purgate	clean
X-purgate	This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-type	clean
X-purgate-Ad	Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate	This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate	clean
X-purgate-size	338
X-purgate-ID	154282::1458138970-00003BBD-765F2E8F/0/0
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.21
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:105037

Show key headers only | View raw

On 16.03.2016 14:58, alister wrote:
> no , i just typed it, while trying to hold a conversation with swmbo 
> :-( apologies to the op if e could not see where i was intending to go 
> with this. 

No problem, I perform quite well at guessing folk's intention.

So, yes, I can extrapolate what you meant. Thanks. :)

Best,
Sven

Thread

Re: empty clause of for loops Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-03-16 11:47 +0100
  Re: empty clause of for loops alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-03-16 13:25 +0000
    Re: empty clause of for loops Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-16 13:45 +0000
      Re: empty clause of for loops alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-03-16 13:58 +0000
        Re: empty clause of for loops "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-03-16 15:36 +0100
    Re: empty clause of for loops Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-03-17 09:23 +0100

csiph-web