Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #95571

Re: Sandboxing Python

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!feeder1.xsusenet.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!nzpost1.xs4all.net!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; 'properly.': 0.07; '*is*': 0.09; '-rf': 0.09; 'builtins': 0.09; 'operator,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'typeerror:': 0.09; 'do,': 0.15; '"use': 0.16; '23,': 0.16; 'attributes.': 0.16; 'eval': 0.16; 'literal,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'stuff.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'skip:{ 20': 0.18; 'language': 0.19; '>>>': 0.20; '2015': 0.20; 'aug': 0.20; 'proposed': 0.20; '"",': 0.22; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'please?': 0.22; 'sorry,': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'import': 0.24; '(most': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'chris': 0.26; 'end,': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.30; "can't": 0.32; 'language.': 0.32; 'maybe': 0.33; 'traceback': 0.33; 'file': 0.34; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'safe': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'believe': 0.66; 'here': 0.66; 'talking': 0.67; 'url:r': 0.67; 'subject': 0.70; 'led': 0.72; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'pythonistas,': 0.84; 'safe.': 0.93; 'url:comments': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Sandboxing Python
Date Sun, 23 Aug 2015 00:52:45 +0100
References <mrb0eh$2md$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmrD3oBaHW64BNV6g9RM8LP7khdYUaXDjMXLeSb7dDe7Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host host-92-24-212-5.ppp.as43234.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
In-Reply-To <CAPTjJmrD3oBaHW64BNV6g9RM8LP7khdYUaXDjMXLeSb7dDe7Dg@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.21.1440287583.17298.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 51
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1440287583 news.xs4all.nl 23764 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38511
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:95571

Show key headers only | View raw


On 23/08/2015 00:44, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> I was always led to believe that the subject was a difficult thing to do,
>> but here
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/learnpython/comments/3huz4x/how_to_do_math_inside_raw_input/
>> is a safe solution in only 23 characters, or are there any discernable flaws
>> in it?
>
>
> I'm sorry, I can't see which solution you're talking about there -
> maybe I just don't know how to read reddit properly. Can you paste the
> proposed code please?
>
> The best I can see there is "use eval but with no builtins". That's
> fundamentally flawed because you don't need builtins to break stuff.
> All you need is a literal, from which you can snag everything else via
> its attributes.
>
> However, for this situation, I would be recommending ast.literal_eval,
> which *is* safe. It's a lot more powerful than "split it into number,
> operator, number" as mentioned at the end, but still can't majorly
> break anything.
>
> ChrisA
>

<code>
 >>> import os
 >>> eval("os.system('rm -rf /')", {"__builtins__":None})
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "<pyshell#8>", line 1, in <module>
     eval("os.system('rm -rf /')", {"__builtins__":None})
   File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
</code>

<comment>
Surely I must I have missed your meaning because I needed just 23 
characters and zero extra lines to create a safe sandbox for this, but 
you've said that the core developers have tried and failed to do this. 
It appears that I didn't just wipe out my entire filesystem and you've 
stated quite matter-of-factly that there is no safe solution... so what 
happened here? Why didn't my filesystem just get wiped out?
</comment>

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Sandboxing Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-23 00:52 +0100

csiph-web