Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #39326

Re: Is Python "venerable"?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.006
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'python': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'language': 0.14; '"...': 0.16; '(psf)': 0.16; '7:45': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip.t-dialin.net': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-dialin.net': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'feb': 0.19; 'foundation': 0.20; 'programming': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'ago': 0.27; 'am,': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'non-profit': 0.29; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'thanks': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'supporting': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'back': 0.62; 'world': 0.63; '20,': 0.65; 'url:tinyurl': 0.66; 'smith': 0.71; 'yourself': 0.77; 'reprint': 0.84; 'rusi': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Subject Re: Is Python "venerable"?
Date Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:19:23 +0100
Organization None
References <roy-198D2A.21455319022013@news.panix.com> <23c59846-5eff-4f7c-8868-965967dd0ac3@i5g2000pbj.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7Bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host p5084ab9c.dip.t-dialin.net
User-Agent KNode/4.7.3
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2089.1361351951.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 22
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1361351951 news.xs4all.nl 6844 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36438
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:39326

Show key headers only | View raw

rusi wrote:

> On Feb 20, 7:45 am, Roy Smith <r...@panix.com> wrote:
>> A quote from Computer World (http://tinyurl.com/bxqjed8):
> 
> Thanks for the link/update
> 
>>
>> "... the Python Software Foundation (PSF) - a non-profit supporting the
>> venerable Python programming language ..."
> 
> Heh! I am reminded:
> Some years ago a new reprint of Knuth's Art of Programming had on the
> back cover something to the effect that this was 'classical CS.'
> 
> So what then is pop-CS, 

"Teach Yourself HTML in 24 Hours"

> folk-CS?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is Python "venerable"? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-02-19 21:45 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-02-20 03:09 +0000
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Barry W Brown <brownbar@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 19:53 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-02-20 16:03 +0000
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-19 23:03 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-20 04:15 +0000
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-20 11:28 -0800
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-02-19 23:10 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 20:42 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 09:08 +0000
      Re: Is Python "venerable"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 20:20 +1100
        Re: Is Python "venerable"? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 02:49 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-02-20 10:19 +0100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Albert Hopkins <marduk@letterboxes.org> - 2013-02-20 06:03 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 12:35 +0100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 22:45 +1100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-20 11:29 -0800
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-02-20 10:33 -0500

csiph-web