Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #100016
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Albert-Jan Roskam <sjeik_appie@hotmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | RE: counting unique numpy subarrays |
| Date | Fri, 4 Dec 2015 22:36:52 +0000 |
| Lines | 27 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.208.1449268679.14615.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <Q1m8y.334924$rR1.113623@fx19.iad> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="windows-1256" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | base64 |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de hO8m9YIjgqIjtfQoolz3LA6SBzll50oFMpZNGqTIhEWA== |
| Return-Path | <sjeik_appie@hotmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.007 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'counting': 0.07; '(sorry': 0.09; 'collections': 0.09; 'slow.': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'def': 0.13; 'array)': 0.16; 'concatenated': 0.16; 'data)': 0.16; 'numpy': 0.16; 'pointers.': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; '2015': 0.20; 'to:2**1': 0.21; 'trying': 0.22; 'bit': 0.23; 'dec': 0.23; 'import': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; '+0000': 0.27; 'fri,': 0.27; 'skip:# 10': 0.27; 'to:no real name:2**1': 0.27; 'skip:e 30': 0.27; 'array': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'url:mailman': 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'date:': 0.31; 'useful': 0.33; 'url:python': 0.33; 'url:listinfo': 0.34; 'returning': 0.35; 'subject:': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'email addr:python.org': 0.36; 'faster': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'seem': 0.37; 'data': 0.39; 'along': 0.39; 'from:': 0.39; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'hello,': 0.40; 'avoid': 0.61; 'skip:n 10': 0.62; 'email name:python-list': 0.67; 'charset:windows-1256': 0.67; 'counts': 0.81 |
| X-TMN | [/d21VXSAM4F/QDLpANZrTKuAumCcWHhC] |
| X-Originating-Email | [sjeik_appie@hotmail.com] |
| Importance | Normal |
| In-Reply-To | <Q1m8y.334924$rR1.113623@fx19.iad> |
| X-OriginalArrivalTime | 04 Dec 2015 22:36:53.0090 (UTC) FILETIME=[45EAEC20:01D12EE4] |
| X-Content-Filtered-By | Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20+ |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.20+ |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:100016 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi (Sorry for topposting) numpy.ravel is faster than numpy.flatten (no copy) numpy.empty is faster than numpy.zeros numpy.fromiter might be useful to avoid the loop (just a hunch) Albert-Jan > From: duncan@invalid.invalid > Subject: counting unique numpy subarrays > Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 19:43:35 +0000 > To: python-list@python.org > > Hello, > I'm trying to find a computationally efficient way of identifying > unique subarrays, counting them and returning an array containing only > the unique subarrays and a corresponding 1D array of counts. The > following code works, but is a bit slow. > > ############### > > from collections import Counter > import numpy > > def bag_data(data): > # data (a numpy array) is bagged along axis 0 > # returns concatenated array and corresponding array of counts > vec_shape = data.shape[1:] > counts = Counter(tuple(arr.flatten()) for arr in data) > data_out = numpy.zeros((len(counts),) + vec_shape) > cnts = numpy.zeros((len(counts,))) > for i, (tup, cnt) in enumerate(counts.iteritems()): > data_out[i] = numpy.array(tup).reshape(vec_shape) > cnts[i] = cnt > return data_out, cnts > > ############### > > I've been looking through the numpy docs, but don't seem to be able to > come up with a clean solution that avoids Python loops. TIA for any > useful pointers. Cheers. > > Duncan > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
counting unique numpy subarrays duncan smith <duncan@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-04 19:43 +0000
RE: counting unique numpy subarrays Albert-Jan Roskam <sjeik_appie@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-04 22:36 +0000
Re: counting unique numpy subarrays duncan smith <duncan@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-05 00:13 +0000
Re: counting unique numpy subarrays Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-12-05 00:06 +0100
Re: counting unique numpy subarrays duncan smith <duncan@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-05 00:18 +0000
csiph-web