Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #8053
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Generator Frustration |
| Date | 2011-06-20 21:42 -0400 |
| References | <4dea7932$0$28716$607ed4bc@cv.net> <08751bba-1216-4ee9-8a02-c14d21322213@a31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.208.1308620570.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 6/20/2011 6:04 PM, Joel wrote: > On Jun 4, 2:27 pm, "TommyVee"<xxxxx...@xxxxxx.xxx> wrote: >> I'm using the SimPy package to run simulations. Anyone who's used this >> package knows that the way it simulates process concurrency is through the >> clever use of yield statements. Some of the code in my programs is very >> complex and contains several repeating sequences of yield statements. I >> want to combine these sequences into common functions. The problem of >> course, is that once a yield gets put into a function, the function is now a >> generator and its behavior changes. ... > I actually found a reasonable answer to this, I think. If one of the > called functions contains a yield, that function is by definition a > generator, A nomenclature note: a function with yield is a 'generator function'. It is an instance of the 'function' class, same as for any other def statement (or lambda expression). It returns an instance of class 'generator, as you note here > and will test as such with 'if type(result)==types.GeneratorType:'. It is the result, and not the function, that is the generator (a type of iterator). -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Generator Frustration "TommyVee" <xxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx> - 2011-06-04 14:27 -0400
Re: Generator Frustration Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-06-05 00:56 +0000
Re: Generator Frustration Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-06-05 13:43 +1200
Re: Generator Frustration Jack Diederich <jackdied@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 22:06 -0400
Re: Generator Frustration "TommyVee" <xxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx> - 2011-06-05 20:11 -0400
Re: Generator Frustration Jan Decaluwe <jan@jandecaluwe.com> - 2011-06-05 11:52 +0200
Re: Generator Frustration Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-06-06 11:07 +0200
Re: Generator Frustration "TommyVee" <xxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx> - 2011-06-07 20:41 -0400
Re: Generator Frustration Joel <joel.welling@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 15:04 -0700
Re: Generator Frustration Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-20 21:42 -0400
Re: Generator Frustration Joel <joel.welling@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 20:03 -0700
csiph-web