Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #39304

Re: Is Python "venerable"?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.029
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'python': 0.09; 'language': 0.14; '"...': 0.16; '(psf)': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'no)': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'stuff.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; '(not': 0.20; 'foundation': 0.20; 'programming': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'non-profit': 0.29; 'point': 0.31; 'received:84': 0.32; 'switch': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'doing': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'supporting': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'more.': 0.62; 'world': 0.63; 'kids,': 0.65; 'url:tinyurl': 0.66; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.68; 'believe': 0.69; 'smith': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'cobol': 0.84; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.84
X-CM-Score 0.00
X-CNFS-Analysis v=2.0 cv=HO4d4PRv c=1 sm=1 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=Tv4_tr9OjFAA:10 a=8hbb3Wpr8bUA:10 a=ihvODaAuJD4A:10 a=OUOv7kDek9cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=8AHkEIZyAAAA:8 a=A420XxBOg4IA:10 a=wUnFXUBBAAAA:20 a=ToRGxOrun9nQyT2Tp4gA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=KXuLW65_DLEA:10 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117
X-AUTH mrabarnett:2500
Date Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:09:08 +0000
From MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Is Python "venerable"?
References <roy-198D2A.21455319022013@news.panix.com>
In-Reply-To <roy-198D2A.21455319022013@news.panix.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
Reply-To python-list@python.org
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2079.1361329742.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 16
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1361329742 news.xs4all.nl 6847 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44149
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:39304

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2013-02-20 02:45, Roy Smith wrote:
> A quote from Computer World (http://tinyurl.com/bxqjed8):
>
> "... the Python Software Foundation (PSF) - a non-profit supporting the
> venerable Python programming language ..."
>
> Venerable?  Come on.  Fortran is venerable.  Cobol is venerable.  Old
> farts use things that are venerable.  I don't want to be an old fart
> (not that I have much say in the matter).
>
> I use Python because I want to be one of the cool kids, doing new hip
> stuff.  Has the language really progressed to the point where it's being
> called "venerable"?  If I want to be one of the cool kids, am I now
> going to have to switch to Lua or Scala or (please, no) JavaScript?
>
I believe that the cools kids don't use the word "hip" any more.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is Python "venerable"? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-02-19 21:45 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-02-20 03:09 +0000
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Barry W Brown <brownbar@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 19:53 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-02-20 16:03 +0000
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-19 23:03 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-20 04:15 +0000
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-20 11:28 -0800
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-02-19 23:10 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 20:42 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 09:08 +0000
      Re: Is Python "venerable"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 20:20 +1100
        Re: Is Python "venerable"? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 02:49 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-02-20 10:19 +0100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Albert Hopkins <marduk@letterboxes.org> - 2013-02-20 06:03 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 12:35 +0100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 22:45 +1100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-20 11:29 -0800
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-02-20 10:33 -0500

csiph-web