Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #39276

Re: Verification of bank number using modulus 11

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <davea@davea.name>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.047
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.00; 'algorithm': 0.03; 'python': 0.09; 'calculating': 0.09; 'subject:number': 0.09; 'subject:using': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; 'resulting': 0.13; '(result': 0.16; 'document:': 0.16; 'isbn': 0.16; 'multiplied': 0.16; 'structure.': 0.16; 'used."': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'team,': 0.18; 'code,': 0.18; 'trying': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'table,': 0.29; 'url:cz': 0.29; 'url:download': 0.29; '"the': 0.29; 'becomes': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'could': 0.32; '"")': 0.33; 'like:': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'code:': 0.33; 'false': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'method': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'rather': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'apply': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'mentioned': 0.63; 'here': 0.65; 'validate': 0.65; 'account': 0.67; 'direct': 0.69; 'banks': 0.71; 'received:74.208': 0.71; '11.': 0.81; '10th': 0.84; '2.7.': 0.84; 'subject:Verification': 0.84; 'url:export': 0.84; 'norway': 0.91; 'divided': 0.93
Date Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:10:54 -0500
From Dave Angel <davea@davea.name>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Verification of bank number using modulus 11
References <CAJ2vgs5uzr1BHF-koYmb5s0tBSkzChTKSQ8k=pCkVC21LWXoAQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To <CAJ2vgs5uzr1BHF-koYmb5s0tBSkzChTKSQ8k=pCkVC21LWXoAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Provags-ID V02:K0:eF/20iv1gh53W0h7mAi9VC7ml9cUObuaeebMfEelZRy meQxXgtxaQAHILjVK0TMWwjzGKlHcDF8WH327oYg1kASSf7403 HZzvViZvT1pAM2KByO/hARBR3lmUZCQ/m6h8Aa1QxOWKdv4mGB X7wkAWIuxNUvhUI0NNW2DPakPRy6jMz9chakLjOaWYxZiRxhWU Be0zK/F2awkuheGzOTqWVsqUVAB1aPYCUGbZFNn1egG18zPWL2 z49jMCPNOR6+hSiBRkCCImGuhhNpnI8/GiHWd1prvP+kS2r9Zu pVMx0CuKVpylYNGrsp0wwT+RqWGFBr0yIZS5XtWxE4xButjKQ= =
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2062.1361308267.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 51
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1361308267 news.xs4all.nl 6908 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35426
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:39276

Show key headers only | View raw


On 02/19/2013 03:50 PM, Morten Engvoldsen wrote:
> Hi Team,
> I am trying to verify the account number using the following algorithm:
>
> "The valid account number is 11 numeric digit without seperator. Eg.
> 86011117947 is a valid account number. All banks apply a modulus-based
> method for the validation of the account structure. The 10-digit account
> number is multiplied from left to right by the following weights: 5, 4, 3,
> 2, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2. The resulting numbers are added up and divided by 11.
> The remainder is subtracted from 11 and becomes the check digit. If the
> remainder is 0, the check digit will be 0. If digits 5 and 6 of the account
> number are zeros, the check digit is calculated on the 7, 8, 9 and 10th
> digit of the account number. Account numbers for which the remainder is 1
> (check digit 10) cannot be used."
>
>   I am trying to validate the Norway account number using the algorithm
> mentioned in the following document:
> http://www.cnb.cz/miranda2/export/sites/www.cnb.cz/cs/platebni_styk/iban/download/TR201.pdf
>
> Here is my code:
>   def calc_checkdigit(isbn):
>          isbn = isbn.replace(".", "")
>          check_digit = int(isbn[-1])
>          isbn = isbn[:-1]
>          if len(isbn) != 10:
>                 return False
>          result = sum((10 - i) * (int(x) if x != 'X' else 10) for i, x in
> enumerate(isbn))
>          return (result % 11) == check_digit
>
> calc_checkdigit(""8601.11.17947"")
>
> In my program : it is calculating 10 digit with weights 10-1, but according
> to above algorithm the weights should be : 5, 4, 3, 2, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2.
>
> Could you please let me know how can i calculate the 10 digit with weights
> 5, 4, 3, 2, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2. I am using python 2.7.
>

Without analyzing your code, the direct answer to your code would be to 
make a table, something like:

weights = [5, 4, 3, 2, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2]

and multiple by weights[i]  rather than (10-i)




-- 
DaveA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Verification of bank number using modulus 11 Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-02-19 16:10 -0500

csiph-web