Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #39204

Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <mikprog@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'attribute': 0.05; 'that?': 0.05; 'ok.': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; "'w')": 0.09; 'errno': 0.09; 'errors,': 0.09; 'ioerror': 0.09; 'open()': 0.09; 'subject:into': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; ':-)': 0.13; 'deprecated.': 0.16; 'handlers.': 0.16; 'people?': 0.16; 'singular': 0.16; 'subject:writing': 0.16; 'subprocess': 0.16; 'suggestion.': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'work.': 0.23; 'errors': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'script': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'skip:[ 10': 0.26; 'received:209.85.212': 0.28; 'error': 0.30; 'getting': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; "can't": 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'thanks': 0.34; 'built-in': 0.35; 'open': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'think': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'from:no real name:2**0': 0.60; 'person,': 0.65; 'wish': 0.70; 'oscar': 0.84; 'recover': 0.84; 'received:209.85.212.56': 0.91; 'seriously,': 0.91; 'convinced': 0.93
X-Received by 10.49.58.167 with SMTP id s7mr788894qeq.5.1361269624522; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 02:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Date Tue, 19 Feb 2013 02:27:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <mailman.2012.1361267738.2939.python-list@python.org>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=92.40.254.242; posting-account=EvoLHwoAAAAe6MGgc84vdAuhA1J1BvTN
References <76620a9e-45fe-499d-b1bf-06b1d2a91c25@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1952.1361200943.2939.python-list@python.org> <16e85bd1-6e5d-4d70-95bf-cc6b986a9f7c@googlegroups.com> <kftm2l$b84$1@r03.glglgl.gl> <8f26ac4d-4732-46ac-bf4e-877696b22241@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1958.1361211131.2939.python-list@python.org> <85cd2254-0800-4448-9117-9175bbfd10f6@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2012.1361267738.2939.python-list@python.org>
User-Agent G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client true
X-Google-IP 92.40.254.242
MIME-Version 1.0
Subject Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe
From mikprog@gmail.com
To comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Message-ID <mailman.2014.1361269632.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 35
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1361269632 news.xs4all.nl 6901 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35086
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:39204

Show key headers only | View raw

> 
> Once you get your script working you can try to provoke errors, and for 
> 
> those errors you can recover from you can write error handlers. For IOError 
> 
> and Python < 3.3 that may involve inspecting the errno attribute and 
> 
> conditionally reraising.


Ok.



> By the way, I don't think
> 
> 
> >> >     PIPEPATH = ["/tmp/mypipe"]
> 
> >> >             self.process = os.popen( self.PIPEPATH, 'w')
> 
> 
> 
> can work. As a few people already told you the built-in open()


Few people?
I thought Oscar was a singular person, not a group of people :-)
Seriously, I am convinced by that approach (thanks) and I wish to go that way, but the problem I am getting now is that the open fails and then I can't go on.

Also, I am now looking at the subprocess as os.popen seems deprecated.
Any opinion on that?
Thanks for your suggestion.

Mik

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-18 07:12 -0800
  Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-02-18 15:21 +0000
    Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-18 08:31 -0800
      Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2013-02-18 17:49 +0100
        Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-18 09:00 -0800
          Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-02-18 11:12 -0700
            Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-19 01:24 -0800
              Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-02-19 10:55 +0100
                Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-19 02:27 -0800
                Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 11:15 +0000
                Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-19 02:27 -0800
              Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 10:47 -0700
                Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-20 09:54 -0800
                Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2013-02-20 18:39 +0000
                Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 22:05 +0000
                Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-20 09:54 -0800
            Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-19 01:24 -0800
    Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-18 08:31 -0800
  Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-02-18 21:29 +0200
    Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-19 04:10 -0800
    Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-19 04:10 -0800
    Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-19 05:39 -0800
      Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-02-19 14:57 +0100
        Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-19 06:38 -0800
        Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-19 06:38 -0800
    Re: improving performance of writing into a pipe mikprog@gmail.com - 2013-02-19 05:39 -0800

csiph-web