Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #31038

Re: surprising behaviour of global dictionaries

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subsequent': 0.04; 'cache': 0.05; 'newbie': 0.05; '__name__': 0.07; 'defines': 0.07; 'key.': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'func': 0.09; 'imports': 0.09; 'library?': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; 'library': 0.15; 'dec': 0.15; "'__main__':": 0.16; '2.7.3': 0.16; 'a()': 0.16; 'dictionary,': 0.16; 'dummy': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip.t-dialin.net': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-dialin.net': 0.16; 'registry': 0.16; 'subject:dictionaries': 0.16; 'surprising': 0.16; 'sys.modules': 0.16; 'trap': 0.16; 'ubuntu.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'implementing': 0.17; 'instance': 0.17; 'module,': 0.17; "shouldn't": 0.17; 'module': 0.19; 'import': 0.21; 'script': 0.24; 'pass': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; '(most': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'assert': 0.29; 'cat': 0.29; 'dictionary': 0.29; 'falls': 0.29; 'class': 0.29; 'expect': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'print': 0.32; 'traceback': 0.33; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'received:org': 0.36; 'skip:{ 10': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'real': 0.61; 'different': 0.63; 'effects,': 0.84; 'seriously,': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Subject Re: surprising behaviour of global dictionaries
Date Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:24:18 +0200
Organization None
References <40ac555b-71c2-445e-814b-6bd1d037dbee@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7Bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host p5084a243.dip.t-dialin.net
User-Agent KNode/4.7.3
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2006.1349796256.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 64
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1349796256 news.xs4all.nl 6846 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59518
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:31038

Show key headers only | View raw


Michele Simionato wrote:

> I have the following module implementing a registry of functions with a
> decorator:
> 
> $ cat x.py
> registry = {} # global dictionary
> 
> def dec(func):
>     registry[func.__name__] = func
>     print registry, id(registry)
>     return func
> 
> if __name__ == '__main__':
>     import xlib
>     print registry, id(registry)
> 
> The library xlib just defines two dummy functions:
> 
> $ cat xlib.py
> from x import dec
> 
> @dec
> def f1():
>     pass
> 
> @dec
> def f2():
>     pass
> 
> Then I get the following output:
> 
> $ python x.py
> {'f1': <function f1 at 0x7f7bce0cd668>} 27920352
> {'f1': <function f1 at 0x7f7bce0cd668>, 'f2': <function f2 at
> {0x7f7bce0cd6e0>} 27920352 } 27395472
> 
> This is surprising since I would expect to have a single global
> dictionary, not two: how comes the registry inside the ``if __name__ ==
> '__main__'`` block is different from the one seen in the library?
> 
> This is python 2.7.3 on Ubuntu.

Welcome to python -- this is a trap every newbie falls into ;)

Seriously, you shouldn't use the main script as a library; it is put into 
the sys.modules cache under the "__main__" key. Subsequent imports under its 
real name will not find that name in the cache and import another instance 
of the module, with puzzling effects, like

$ cat x.py 
import x
class A: pass
a = A()
assert isinstance(a, x.A)

$ python x.py 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "x.py", line 4, in <module>
    assert isinstance(a, x.A)
AssertionError
$ 

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

surprising behaviour of global dictionaries Michele Simionato <michele.simionato@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 08:08 -0700
  Re: surprising behaviour of global dictionaries Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-10-09 17:24 +0200
    Re: surprising behaviour of global dictionaries Michele Simionato <michele.simionato@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 08:36 -0700
      Re: surprising behaviour of global dictionaries Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-10-09 12:10 -0400
    Re: surprising behaviour of global dictionaries Michele Simionato <michele.simionato@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 08:36 -0700
    Re: surprising behaviour of global dictionaries Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-09 15:53 +0000
      Re: surprising behaviour of global dictionaries Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-10-09 19:45 +0200

csiph-web