Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #30985

Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ?

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <d@davea.name>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'skip:[ 20': 0.03; 'true,': 0.04; 'binary': 0.05; 'removes': 0.05; 'python': 0.09; 'argument,': 0.09; 'portions': 0.09; 'terry': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.10; "wouldn't": 0.11; 'subject:python': 0.11; 'assume': 0.11; '"from': 0.16; '3.2.': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'string': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'byte': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'import': 0.21; 'claimed': 0.22; 'converted': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'second': 0.24; 'least': 0.25; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'converting': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'author,': 0.29; 'decimal': 0.29; 'factor': 0.29; 'overhead': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'usually': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'curious': 0.33; 'doubt': 0.33; 'largely': 0.33; 'right?': 0.33; 'point.': 0.33; 'whatever': 0.35; 'faster': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'skip:t 40': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'end': 0.40; 'sincerely': 0.60; 'spending': 0.61; 'within': 0.64; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.68; 'received:74.208': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'subjectcharset:utf-8': 0.72; '100': 0.78; 'subject:get': 0.81; 'float,': 0.84; 'subject:value': 0.84; 'ratio': 0.91; 'angel': 0.93
Date Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:20:23 -0400
From Dave Angel <d@davea.name>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version 1.0
To Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ?
References <91ff9b33-c212-4be0-8ed0-1f6b16f56865@googlegroups.com> <5072E7CC.2070405@davea.name> <CAPTjJmons5fwExNOaug0dNsym2eLe5Pduh6cVqynSAPoSowQdQ@mail.gmail.com> <5072EDA6.6040202@davea.name> <k4vvjt$dtr$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To <k4vvjt$dtr$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Provags-ID V02:K0:3K+EF/4Yjb2zRGF925p+uAUeYu+2qtK3RnuMRdNZy9i cDNOOp/enCBd7AupJb7ZNw34oEF9oqeAkzRke08Msn9n7i4Z5k pKRpqVsHweFy3PPB1kU7gPpgBGIlRSz362LNUhfTK0VGQ0dBLg 1S9mPc79b8MM7AsASSMKsH+1eQg5RAe3GZlQr49azowAb6pPwq gNjvR5zsX6pyDUCWt2Ea6rMgGEf/WDJP4CnT5DXr2Fx5GLlNcI LExNKizNoctFS7CieLw1ikhbAa9u9trk3C655xR7qh2UMu0lt5 bEGgKZcpKWDl0ndxjKxuNthBuK7Iefiq13xFnV9Aslr1RX4Mg= =
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
Reply-To d@davea.name
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1977.1349749258.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 44
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1349749259 news.xs4all.nl 6905 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38400
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:30985

Show key headers only | View raw


On 10/08/2012 09:45 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 10/8/2012 11:13 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
>
>>> Isn't it true, though, that Python 3.3 has a completely new
>>> implementation of decimal that largely removes this disadvantage?
>
>> I wouldn't know, I'm on 3.2.  However, I sincerely doubt if it's within
>> a factor of 100 of the speed of the binary float, at least on
>
> >>> import timeit as tt
> >>> tt.repeat("float('1.0')-float('0.9999999999')")
> [0.6856039948871151, 0.669049830953858, 0.668688006423692]
> >>> tt.repeat("Decimal('1.0')-Decimal('0.9999999999')", "from decimal
> import Decimal")
> [1.3204655578092428, 1.286977575486688, 1.2893188292009938]
>
> >>> tt.repeat("a-b", "a = 1.0; b=0.9999999999")
> [0.06100386171601713, 0.044538539999592786, 0.04451548406098027]
> >>> tt.repeat("a-b", "from decimal import Decimal as D; a = D('1.0');
> b = D('0.9999999999')")
> [0.14685526219517442, 0.12909696344064514, 0.12646059371189722]
>
> A factor of 3, as S. Krah, the cdecimal author, claimed

I concede the point.  But I was "sincere" in my doubt.

What I'm curious about now is 1) how much the various operators vary in
that 3:1 ratio  and 2) how much the overhead portions are using of that
time. 

I have to assume that timeit.repeat doesn't count the time spent in its
second argument, right?  Because converting a string to a Decimal should
be much faster than converting one to float.  But what about the
overhead of eval(), or whatever it uses?  Is the "a-b" converted to byte
code just once?  Or is it recompiled each time through tje loop?

I have to admit not spending much time in timeit();  I usually end up
timing things with my own loops.  So i'd really like to understand how
overhead is figured.

-- 

DaveA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? iMath <redstone-cold@163.com> - 2012-10-08 07:07 -0700
  Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-10-08 10:48 -0400
  Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 02:00 +1100
    Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm � Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-09 11:39 +0000
  Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-10-08 11:13 -0400
  Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2012-10-08 16:44 +0200
  Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 02:19 +1100
  Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-10-08 21:45 -0400
  Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-10-08 22:20 -0400

csiph-web