Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #58357

Re: multiprocessing: child process race to answer (forgot to Cc: the list)

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeeder.ewetel.de!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <wrw@mac.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'mrab': 0.05; '__name__': 0.09; 'friday,': 0.09; 'snippet': 0.09; 'subject:process': 0.09; 'whichever': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; '#this': 0.16; '&gt;&gt;': 0.16; "'__main__':": 0.16; 'bsd': 0.16; 'check.': 0.16; 'finds': 0.16; 'for,': 0.16; 'i.e.,': 0.16; 'inputs': 0.16; 'letting': 0.16; 'master.': 0.16; 'received:mac.com': 0.16; 'simplest': 0.16; 'sockets': 0.16; 'specific,': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:skip:m 10': 0.16; 'sys.exit(0)': 0.16; 'tried:': 0.16; 'try?': 0.16; 'typo': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'library': 0.18; 'variable': 0.18; 'received:10.0.1': 0.19; 'solution.': 0.20; 'written': 0.21; '>>>': 0.22; 'example': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'email addr:gmail.com&gt;': 0.22; 'to:name:python-list@python.org': 0.22; 'print': 0.22; 'creating': 0.23; '&gt;&gt;&gt;': 0.24; 'looks': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; '&gt;': 0.26; 'hall': 0.26; 'defined': 0.27; 'to:2**1': 0.27; 'correct': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'subject:list': 0.30; 'url:mailman': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'os,': 0.31; 'prints': 0.31; 'ray': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.33; 'style': 0.33; 'maybe': 0.34; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'basic': 0.35; "can't": 0.35; 'problem.': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'objects': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'accessible': 0.36; 'disk': 0.36; 'url:listinfo': 0.36; 'charset :us-ascii': 0.36; 'received:10.0': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'detail': 0.37; 'so,': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'thank': 0.38; 'nov': 0.38; 'received:17': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'anything': 0.39; 'bill': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'solve': 0.60; 'simple': 0.61; 'further': 0.61; 'complete': 0.62; 'provide': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'situation': 0.65; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'hang': 0.67; 'response.': 0.68; 'answer.': 0.68; 'periodically': 0.68; 'evaluate': 0.72; '11:44': 0.84; 'header:In-reply-to:1': 0.84; 'wakes': 0.84; '2013,': 0.91; 'processes,': 0.91; 'subject:answer': 0.95; '2013': 0.98
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-11-02_03:2013-11-02,2013-11-02,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1308280000 definitions=main-1311020307
Content-type multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EBCEF874-6E9A-4302-954D-FAAA074826C9"
MIME-version 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject Re: multiprocessing: child process race to answer (forgot to Cc: the list)
From William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com>
In-reply-to <CAH=v_kk=1DCUUBHmFAf3CUq8cf9t96YzR-nUVy4godXY4+05uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date Sat, 02 Nov 2013 23:07:42 -0400
References <f71ef852-81ee-4ce6-beaa-17a881ed6d16@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1946.1383360757.18130.python-list@python.org> <e92096bb-f571-4a4f-9dcc-604e4cce4125@googlegroups.com> <6276BD6E-B0A2-4443-9274-E27BBC3C0152@mac.com> <CAH=v_kk=1DCUUBHmFAf3CUq8cf9t96YzR-nUVy4godXY4+05uw@mail.gmail.com>
To Sherard Hall <smhall05@gmail.com>, "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
X-Mailer Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1964.1383448097.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 147
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1383448097 news.xs4all.nl 15892 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54187
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:58357

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Nov 2, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Sherard Hall <smhall05@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you for the response. Processing time is very important so I suspect having to write to disk will take more time than letting the other processes complete without finding the answer. So I did some profiling one process finds the answer in about 250ms, but since I can't stop the other processes, it takes about 800ms before I can use the answer.  Do you recommend a global variable flag? Any other suggestions?
> 
> On Nov 2, 2013 8:17 AM, "William Ray Wing" <wrw@mac.com> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:03 AM, smhall05 <smhall05@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Friday, November 1, 2013 10:52:40 PM UTC-4, MRAB wrote:
> >> On 02/11/2013 02:35, smhall05 wrote:
> >>
> >>> I am using a basic multiprocessing snippet I found:
> >>>
> >>> #-----------------------------------------------------
> >>> from multiprocessing import Pool
> >>>
> >>> def  f(x):
> >>>     return x*x
> >>>
> >>> if __name__ == '__main__':
> >>>     pool = Pool(processes=4)              # start 4 worker processes
> >>>     result = pool.apply_async(f, [10])    # evaluate "f(10)" asynchronously
> >>>     print result.get(timeout=1)
> >>>     print pool.map(f, range(10))          # prints "[0, 1, 4,..., 81]"
> >>> #---------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> I am using this code to have each process go off and solve the same problem, just with different inputs to the problem. I need to be able to kill all processes once 1 of n processes has come up with the solution. There will only be one answer.
> >>>
> >>> I have tried:
> >>>
> >>> sys.exit(0) #this causes the program to hang
> >>> pool.close()
> >>> pool.terminate
> >>>
> >>
> >> Did you actually mean "pool.terminate", or is that a typo for
> >>
> >> "pool.terminate()"?
> >>
> >>> These still allow further processing before the program terminates. What else can I try? I am not able to share the exact code at this time. I can provide more detail if I am unclear. Thank you
> >>>
> >
> > I am not sure to be honest, however it turns out that I can't use pool.terminate() because pool is defined in main and not accessible under my def in which I check for the correct answer.
> > --
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> 
> So, the simplest solution to that situation is to have whichever subprocess that finds the correct answer set a flag which the calling process can check.  Depending on your OS, that flag can be anything from setting a lock to something as simple as creating a file which the calling process periodically wakes up and looks for, maybe just a file in which the subprocess has written the answer.
> 
> Bill
> 
> -- 
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Well, the multiprocessing library provides listeners and clients that wrap BSD style sockets and allow you to send (push) arbitrary python objects to a listener, i.e., the master.  There might be something better that was OS specific, but this will keep it pure python.  I've not tested it, but there is a simple example here on Stackoverflow: 

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6920858/interprocess-communication-in-python

-Bill

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

multiprocessing: child process race to answer smhall05 <smhall05@gmail.com> - 2013-11-01 19:35 -0700
  Re: multiprocessing: child process race to answer MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-11-02 02:52 +0000
    Re: multiprocessing: child process race to answer smhall05 <smhall05@gmail.com> - 2013-11-01 22:03 -0700
      Re: multiprocessing: child process race to answer William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2013-11-02 08:17 -0400
      Re: multiprocessing: child process race to answer Sherard Hall <smhall05@gmail.com> - 2013-11-02 11:44 -0400
      Re: multiprocessing: child process race to answer (forgot to Cc: the list) William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2013-11-02 23:07 -0400
  Re: multiprocessing: child process race to answer cappleman@gmail.com - 2013-11-03 02:10 -0800
    Re: multiprocessing: child process race to answer Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-03 10:24 +0000

csiph-web