Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #91475

Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.012
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'assume': 0.11; '"\\n":': 0.16; 'buffering': 0.16; 'ends,': 0.16; 'expecting': 0.16; 'fits': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'subject:Accessing': 0.16; 'tcp': 0.16; 'true:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'alternate': 0.18; 'cc:2**0': 0.21; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.21; 'parsing': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; '2015': 0.23; 'sat,': 0.23; 'this:': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'said,': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'this.': 0.28; 'boundaries': 0.29; 'termination': 0.29; 'read,': 0.29; 'that.': 0.30; 'writes': 0.31; 'operations': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; "can't": 0.32; 'though,': 0.32; 'usually': 0.33; 'case,': 0.34; 'running': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'could': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'smaller': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'stuff': 0.38; 'end': 0.39; 'data': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'subject:with': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; '30,': 0.63; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.90; 'edwards': 0.91; 'subject:Server': 0.91; 'period.': 0.95
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=U1rUbdEMkFgmvHiaidGc88VWIrduB59LRPG5EnfFizM=; b=ptHVUzDLQLfZ8J0k2YLR02Mms6CWqL8E2QA42coJbNUhRq9xh/rYe/gyxCO3R4nLT2 SwpM2MXEIrIV010/V94A94DtgVpztO6Br3xs+EK47kwuB/44itCxClyELAWzb6KEfhQk B2OupFc1rB0M/jpGFfdD7rTxi1gd35f4at1rzaryMZ7EQlivjDlmEikEUQClIzJvAdEs JjJWDH8Qy4gmHYWyijF+cop8RRGyG77sfphYY+LSrJuHo8vtfLcKIzUkeV3O9WBfyHpB IjQtGjKNYmzXSgylyf3nyqxLdnv9lvVc/u20kuBTvlB1saGenSu8jlJusVQbRlHXp+7N bFAg==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.107.16.149 with SMTP id 21mr11235186ioq.53.1432917606643; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <mka456$iek$1@reader1.panix.com>
References <CAO2fJ-+UjZNqo2yQRRkuSsEJwFAGOnbB9JPCCWX7zX7jt_5POg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGGBd_pEf0E6skDgzVuWLsPEX73OvpTkQ=CwgjKF6Yz+fC6bsw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.181.1432910260.5151.python-list@python.org> <mka456$iek$1@reader1.panix.com>
Date Sat, 30 May 2015 02:40:06 +1000
Subject Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Cc "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.196.1432917609.5151.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 28
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1432917609 news.xs4all.nl 2935 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45407
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:91475

Show key headers only | View raw


On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> If you assume TCP read/write operations are atomic and "message"
> boundaries are preserved, your code is wrong.  It will eventually
> fail.  Period.

Indeed. That said, though, if your writes are all smaller than one
packet, and you perfectly alternate a write and a read, a write and a
read, at both ends, then you can go a very long way without ever
running into this. In that case, you could have proper parsing and
buffering as a failure case, with the normal case expecting a
termination mark at the end of the socket-read - something like this:

write(query)
data = read(as_much_as_possible)
if data[-1] != "\n":
    # Huh, stuff got split.
    while True:
        more_data = read(as_much_as_possible)
        data += moredata
        if data[-1] == "\n": break
        cope_with_possibility_of(socket_disconnection)
handle_response(data)

Alternating writes and reads ensures that two messages can't be
combined, and if a single message fits inside a packet, it'll usually
be sent that way. But you still can't guarantee that.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2015-05-29 09:37 -0400
  Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-29 16:29 +0000
    Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-30 02:40 +1000
      Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-29 16:59 +0000
      Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-05-29 20:21 +0300

csiph-web