Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #91475
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.012 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'assume': 0.11; '"\\n":': 0.16; 'buffering': 0.16; 'ends,': 0.16; 'expecting': 0.16; 'fits': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'subject:Accessing': 0.16; 'tcp': 0.16; 'true:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'alternate': 0.18; 'cc:2**0': 0.21; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.21; 'parsing': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; '2015': 0.23; 'sat,': 0.23; 'this:': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'said,': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'this.': 0.28; 'boundaries': 0.29; 'termination': 0.29; 'read,': 0.29; 'that.': 0.30; 'writes': 0.31; 'operations': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; "can't": 0.32; 'though,': 0.32; 'usually': 0.33; 'case,': 0.34; 'running': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'could': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'smaller': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'stuff': 0.38; 'end': 0.39; 'data': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'subject:with': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; '30,': 0.63; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.90; 'edwards': 0.91; 'subject:Server': 0.91; 'period.': 0.95 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=U1rUbdEMkFgmvHiaidGc88VWIrduB59LRPG5EnfFizM=; b=ptHVUzDLQLfZ8J0k2YLR02Mms6CWqL8E2QA42coJbNUhRq9xh/rYe/gyxCO3R4nLT2 SwpM2MXEIrIV010/V94A94DtgVpztO6Br3xs+EK47kwuB/44itCxClyELAWzb6KEfhQk B2OupFc1rB0M/jpGFfdD7rTxi1gd35f4at1rzaryMZ7EQlivjDlmEikEUQClIzJvAdEs JjJWDH8Qy4gmHYWyijF+cop8RRGyG77sfphYY+LSrJuHo8vtfLcKIzUkeV3O9WBfyHpB IjQtGjKNYmzXSgylyf3nyqxLdnv9lvVc/u20kuBTvlB1saGenSu8jlJusVQbRlHXp+7N bFAg== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Received | by 10.107.16.149 with SMTP id 21mr11235186ioq.53.1432917606643; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:40:06 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <mka456$iek$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| References | <CAO2fJ-+UjZNqo2yQRRkuSsEJwFAGOnbB9JPCCWX7zX7jt_5POg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGGBd_pEf0E6skDgzVuWLsPEX73OvpTkQ=CwgjKF6Yz+fC6bsw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.181.1432910260.5151.python-list@python.org> <mka456$iek$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| Date | Sat, 30 May 2015 02:40:06 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Cc | "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.20+ |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.196.1432917609.5151.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 28 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1432917609 news.xs4all.nl 2935 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45407 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:91475 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> If you assume TCP read/write operations are atomic and "message"
> boundaries are preserved, your code is wrong. It will eventually
> fail. Period.
Indeed. That said, though, if your writes are all smaller than one
packet, and you perfectly alternate a write and a read, a write and a
read, at both ends, then you can go a very long way without ever
running into this. In that case, you could have proper parsing and
buffering as a failure case, with the normal case expecting a
termination mark at the end of the socket-read - something like this:
write(query)
data = read(as_much_as_possible)
if data[-1] != "\n":
# Huh, stuff got split.
while True:
more_data = read(as_much_as_possible)
data += moredata
if data[-1] == "\n": break
cope_with_possibility_of(socket_disconnection)
handle_response(data)
Alternating writes and reads ensures that two messages can't be
combined, and if a single message fits inside a packet, it'll usually
be sent that way. But you still can't guarantee that.
ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2015-05-29 09:37 -0400
Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-29 16:29 +0000
Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-30 02:40 +1000
Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-29 16:59 +0000
Re: Accessing DataSocket Server with Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-05-29 20:21 +0300
csiph-web