Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #86420
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'broken': 0.04; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'widely': 0.05; 'elements.': 0.07; 'suppose': 0.07; 'arrays': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'overflow': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'yeah,': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'bug': 0.12; 'language.': 0.14; '"community".': 0.16; 'galaxy': 0.16; 'lengths': 0.16; 'margin': 0.16; 'phones.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'so.': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'fix': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'stack': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'proposed': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'bytes': 0.24; 'pointer': 0.24; 'guys': 0.24; 'looks': 0.24; 'mention': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'specifically': 0.29; 'fixed': 0.29; 'url:bugs': 0.29; 'originally': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'piece': 0.31; 'url:python': 0.33; 'community': 0.33; 'bugs': 0.33; 'next': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'url:eu': 0.37; 'wrong': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'thank': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'most': 0.60; 'devices': 0.61; 'you.': 0.62; 'developed': 0.63; 'happen': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'forward': 0.65; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'due': 0.66; 'smith': 0.68; 'bow': 0.84; 'comparable': 0.84; 'otten': 0.84; 'samsung': 0.84; 'dealt': 0.91 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
| Subject | Re: Bug in timsort!? |
| Date | Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:55:12 +0000 |
| References | <1cf84559-3a63-4799-a879-ae8e513d387e@googlegroups.com> <mckke8$con$1@ger.gmane.org> <mckrpt$j10$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | host-92-24-216-15.ppp.as43234.net |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <mckrpt$j10$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.19201.1424883341.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 38 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1424883341 news.xs4all.nl 2849 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39394 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:86420 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 25/02/2015 16:04, Peter Otten wrote: > Sturla Molden wrote: > >> On 24/02/15 22:34, Roy Smith wrote: >>> http://envisage-project.eu/proving-android-java-and-python-sorting-algorithm-is-broken-and-how-to-fix-it/ >>> >> >> This is awful. It is broken for arrays longer than 2**49 elements. With >> 8 bytes per PyObject* pointer this is >4096 terabytes of RAM. I don't >> see how we can fix this in time. >> >> Oh yes, and they mention that TimSort is used on billions of devices due >> to Android mobile phones. This is clearly very relevant for mobile >> phones. Next thing you know your litte Samsung Galaxy with more than >> 4096 terabytes breaks down from a stack overflow in TimSort. > > Yeah, I'm looking forward to see comparable bugs being closed as "cannot > reproduce" by some of the jokers. I suppose that you all had a note > scribbled on the margin of your copy of Arithmetica that this cannot happen > with arrays of lengths seen in practice until 2038 or so. > > These guys found a bug that is subtler than what most of us have dealt with > in a widely used piece of code originally developed by one of the smarter > members of the python "community". > > I bow my head to them and say thank you. > Reading the bug report http://bugs.python.org/issue23515, specifically msg236586, it looks as if the proposed fix was wrong and one of the smarter members of the python community fixed it. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug in timsort!? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2015-02-24 13:34 -0800
Re: Bug in timsort!? Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2015-02-24 15:40 -0600
Re: Bug in timsort!? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-02-24 21:49 +0000
Re: Bug in timsort!? sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-02-24 14:36 -0800
Re: Bug in timsort!? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-02-25 00:38 +0000
Re: Bug in timsort!? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-02-24 22:45 +0000
Re: Bug in timsort!? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-02-24 15:59 -0700
Re: Bug in timsort!? Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 11:34 +0000
Re: Bug in timsort!? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-02-25 15:49 +0000
Re: Bug in timsort!? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 10:33 +1100
Re: Bug in timsort!? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-02-24 23:38 +0000
Re: Bug in timsort!? Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2015-02-24 17:50 -0600
Re: Bug in timsort!? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 11:07 +1100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Paddy <paddy3118@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 01:10 -0800
Re: Bug in timsort!? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 21:11 +1100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2015-02-24 16:38 -0800
Re: Bug in timsort!? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-02-24 21:52 -0500
Re: Bug in timsort!? Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-02-24 21:41 -0500
Re: Bug in timsort!? Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2015-02-25 01:04 -0800
Re: Bug in timsort!? Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 14:58 +0100
Re: Bug in timsort!? alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2015-02-25 15:03 +0000
Re: Bug in timsort!? Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 09:23 -0600
Re: Bug in timsort!? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-02-25 16:08 -0500
Re: Bug in timsort!? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2015-02-25 19:12 -0500
Re: Bug in timsort!? Jonas Wielicki <jonas@wielicki.name> - 2015-02-25 15:07 +0100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 01:33 +1100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 16:05 +0100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 02:11 +1100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-02-25 17:04 +0100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Mario Figueiredo <marfig@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 18:22 +0100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 19:41 +0100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Jonas Wielicki <jonas@wielicki.name> - 2015-02-25 19:46 +0100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-02-25 20:07 +0000
Re: Bug in timsort!? Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 17:44 +0100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Mario Figueiredo <marfig@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 18:29 +0100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-02-26 10:13 +1100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 22:51 -0700
Re: Bug in timsort!? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-02-25 16:50 +0000
Re: Bug in timsort!? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-02-25 16:55 +0000
Re: Bug in timsort!? Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2015-02-25 08:56 -0800
Re: Bug in timsort!? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 04:18 +1100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-02-25 18:21 +0100
Re: Bug in timsort!? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 12:42 -0700
Re: Bug in timsort!? Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 09:33 +0200
csiph-web