Re: Design thought for callbacks

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!bcyclone05.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone05.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<jeanpierreda@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.066
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.87; 'S': 0.00; 'callback': 0.09; 'method,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'broken.': 0.16; 'closure,': 0.16; 'expect,': 0.16; 'unlikely': 0.16; 'wrappers': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'feb': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'instance,': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'references': 0.26; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'fri,': 0.33; 'not.': 0.33; 'no,': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'method': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.38; 'expect': 0.39; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'hang': 0.67; '20,': 0.68; 'fact,': 0.69; 'subject:Design': 0.78; '2015': 0.84; 'subject:thought': 0.84; 'instantly.': 0.91
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ltaIKPQn4pObs2k6fTlaAT6yL3IPYNUtptdZviNnSUg=; b=FPDgwqv3K5i+oyR35SFSi4IKvLcPxiUE64cN5mG25FF6ykGYTjaUCyBaTq1/1LzcWc 2ZZfeEv/sN2aICzNn9phnQwqSqsdqeyxHG8gofYFRb30iIcU6cODbh4okzJqWaqS3DOu Ugz2l4hYvX0dS9bRQDr7S0Jn8rE3jZ8Z1jRD1FFLj9DaGaytTM/esvjoDZnyStHfI+p9 5tS9mueVGrTdU8zf7/6w7pTOLRLuyQN2SvDKftj97Ou0e7sZv1XwfWvva/qmyvxaxoM8 yO0/6yMvi71/Op8wPzlAdOJvxghb7FV5T/hbF3VvEnRjrOFGV3HGMmWMCEzmghDlXQbz I4dw==
X-Received	by 10.140.148.4 with SMTP id 4mr6013852qhu.61.1424528716384; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 06:25:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version	1.0
In-Reply-To	<CAPTjJmpEHQV2PpaZvszuTGn0_GNg0sWV6aLenbQsZrSXCy2YKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References	<33677AE8-B2FA-49F9-9304-C8D93784255D@gmail.com> <CAPTjJmpEHQV2PpaZvszuTGn0_GNg0sWV6aLenbQsZrSXCy2YKQ@mail.gmail.com>
From	Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com>
Date	Sat, 21 Feb 2015 06:24:36 -0800
Subject	Re: Design thought for callbacks
To	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc	"comp.lang.python" <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.18965.1424528721.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	14
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1424528721 news.xs4all.nl 2868 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60247
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
X-Received-Bytes	3707
X-Received-Body-CRC	329469865
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:86038

Show key headers only | View raw

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, it's not. I would advise using strong references - if the callback
> is a closure, for instance, you need to hang onto it, because there
> are unlikely to be any other references to it. If I register a
> callback with you, I expect it to be called; I expect, in fact, that
> that *will* keep my object alive.

For that matter, if the callback is a method, you need to hang onto
it, because method wrappers are generated on demand, so the method
would be removed from the valid callbacks instantly.

Weak references for callbacks are broken.

-- Devin

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Design thought for callbacks Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2015-02-21 06:24 -0800

csiph-web