Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #25006
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <howmuchistoday@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.002 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'explicitly': 0.04; 'context': 0.05; 'python': 0.09; 'generators': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'def': 0.10; 'sat,': 0.15; 'code?': 0.16; 'coroutines': 0.16; 'downside': 0.16; 'foo():': 0.16; 'markup.': 0.16; 'resource,': 0.16; 'threads': 0.16; 'true:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'yield': 0.17; 'do.': 0.21; 'explicit': 0.22; 'this:': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:2**1': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'cc:addr:gmail.com': 0.27; 'first,': 0.27; 'structures': 0.27; '(new': 0.29; 'interactions': 0.29; 'locking': 0.29; 'handled': 0.29; 'function': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; '(and': 0.32; 'switch': 0.32; 'print': 0.32; 'point.': 0.33; "can't": 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'thanks': 0.34; 'whatever': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'flow': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'level': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'easier': 0.38; 'real': 0.61; 'subject:, ': 0.61; 'more': 0.63; 'jul': 0.65; 'us,': 0.74; 'sole': 0.75; 'running,': 0.84; 'upside': 0.84; 'controller': 0.91; 'hand,': 0.97 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Date | Sat, 7 Jul 2012 01:29:11 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <mailman.1884.1341646449.4697.python-list@python.org> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=210.117.199.100; posting-account=MbgxqAoAAACiGFd80Qtwxi2J7qp6KsRy |
| References | <456501fb-af2d-4741-9b73-33c65d7f0aa8@t1g2000pbl.googlegroups.com> <mailman.1884.1341646449.4697.python-list@python.org> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Google-Web-Client | true |
| X-Google-IP | 210.117.199.100 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Subject | Re: why greenlet, gevent or the stackless are needed? |
| From | "self.python" <howmuchistoday@gmail.com> |
| To | comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Cc | python-list@python.org, "self.python" <howmuchistoday@gmail.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1885.1341649754.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 59 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1341649754 news.xs4all.nl 6948 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60101 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:25006 |
Show key headers only | View raw
r
2012년 7월 7일 토요일 오후 4시 33분 26초 UTC+9, Devin Jeanpierre 님의 말:
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 3:09 AM, self.python <howmuchistoday@gmail.com> wrote:
> > it there somthing that "yield" can't do
> > or just it is easier or powerful?
>
> couroutine-like generators can't give up control flow unless they are
> the top level function handled by the coroutine controller thing. For
> example, we can do this:
>
> def foo():
> while True:
> next_value = (yield)
> print next_value
>
> But we can't do this:
>
> def yap():
> next_value = (yield)
> print next_value
>
> def foo():
> while True:
> yap()
>
> If we explicitly say that "yap" can control us, via "yield from" (new
> in Python 3.3), then we can do something like the above, but this
> still requires explicit markup. In all other releases of Python, this
> is impossible.
>
> On the other hand, coroutines in greenlet et al can do a coroutine
> context switch at any point. The upside is that this is more flexible
> (and does something generators pre-3.3 cannot). The downside is that
> you now need locking structures to guarantee atomic interactions with
> a shared resource, whereas with generators you know that you always
> are the sole thing running, until you do a yield (and unless real
> threads or greenlet or whatever are involved, of course.)
>
> -- Devin
first, thanks for good answer:)
but I don't understand why the code
def yap():
next_value = (yield)
print next_value
def foo():
while True:
yap()
really do.
what is the purpose of that code?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
why greenlet, gevent or the stackless are needed? "self.python" <howmuchistoday@gmail.com> - 2012-07-07 00:09 -0700
Re: why greenlet, gevent or the stackless are needed? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-07-07 03:33 -0400
Re: why greenlet, gevent or the stackless are needed? "self.python" <howmuchistoday@gmail.com> - 2012-07-07 01:29 -0700
Re: why greenlet, gevent or the stackless are needed? "self.python" <howmuchistoday@gmail.com> - 2012-07-07 01:29 -0700
Re: why greenlet, gevent or the stackless are needed? Damjan <gdamjan@gmail.com> - 2012-07-07 17:38 +0200
csiph-web