Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #90985

Re: No ttk in 2.7

From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: No ttk in 2.7
Date 2015-05-20 21:55 +0100
References <87r3qbqlve.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <5e9aac07-e210-4eb5-a3d7-cfa37cb3f6ab@googlegroups.com> <414bf0ad-557d-4373-8452-ab089888225e@googlegroups.com> <87iobnqdxi.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.188.1432155376.17265.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 20/05/2015 19:52, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Op Wednesday 20 May 2015 18:47 CEST schreef Ned Batchelder:
>
>> On Wednesday, May 20, 2015 at 12:43:29 PM UTC-4, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, May 20, 2015 at 12:35:40 PM UTC-4, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>>> I want to start playing with tkinter, but there are some
>>>> differences between 2 and 3. For this I use at the moment the
>>>> following code: import sys
>>>>
>>>> if sys.version_info[0] < 3:
>>>> import Tkinter as tk
>>>> import ttk
>>>> else:
>>>> import tkinter as tk
>>>> from   tkinter import ttk
>>>> or can it better be done in another way?
>>>
>>> Are you sure you want this program to run under both 2.x and 3.x?
>>> That will add a layer of complexity to your project. If your
>>> goal is to learn how to use Tkinter, you might be better off just
>>> picking one version of Python, and sticking with it.
>>>
>>> Deciding what versions of Python to support is not always a simple
>>> decision.  It should be based on a realistic assessment of who will
>>> be using your program, and what requirements they will have.
>>>
>>> --Ned.
>>
>> Oh, and I meant to include this: if you *do* want to support both
>> 2.x and 3.x, the six module can make it easier. It helps smooth over
>> modules that have been moved. You can use this line, for example:
>>
>> from six.moves import tkinter_ttk as ttk
>
> Thanks for the tip. I will look into it.
>

https://docs.python.org/3/howto/pyporting.html

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

No ttk in 2.7 Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-20 18:01 +0200
  Re: No ttk in 2.7 Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-05-20 09:43 -0700
    Re: No ttk in 2.7 Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-05-20 09:47 -0700
      Re: No ttk in 2.7 Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-20 20:52 +0200
        Re: No ttk in 2.7 Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-20 21:55 +0100
    Re: No ttk in 2.7 Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-20 20:51 +0200
  Re: No ttk in 2.7 Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2015-05-20 12:03 -0500
    Re: No ttk in 2.7 Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-20 20:54 +0200
      Re: No ttk in 2.7 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-20 13:30 -0600
  Re: No ttk in 2.7 Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> - 2015-05-21 14:04 +0000

csiph-web