Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #85596

Re: Odd version scheme

References <54DCD8A5.9050907@yahoo.no> <20150212110506.39410d54@bigbox.christie.dr> <CANc-5Uz3SyYomPXfTG9pFA+87VAC8TnvGp--VT8F47PdaA8Jeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date 2015-02-13 04:26 +1100
Subject Re: Odd version scheme
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.18699.1423761972.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Skip Montanaro
<skip.montanaro@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the reasons
> the Python-dev gang decided that there would be no micro versions > 9. There
> are too many similar assumptions about version numbers out in the real
> world.

I don't think the policy is quite that strong; 2.7.10 has already been
scheduled, and there's sufficient resistance to a Python 4.0 that
there's likely to be a 3.10; although some people are saying that it
might be worth following 3.9 with 4.0, drop only stuff that's been
deprecated for a long time (on par with the disallowing of string
exceptions during 2.x), and basically dodge the whole issue. But yes,
there's a general feeling that two-digit version components cause
trouble, and it's usually easy enough to avoid them.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Odd version scheme Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-13 04:26 +1100

csiph-web