Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #85593
| References | (3 earlier) <87zj8jcqxr.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <mbi333$836$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87twyrchxi.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <mailman.18691.1423756796.18130.python-list@python.org> <87oaozcbld.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-02-13 04:08 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Python discussed in Nature |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.18696.1423760909.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote: > $ python3 > Python 3.4.1 (default, Nov 3 2014, 14:38:10) > [GCC 4.9.1 20140930 (Red Hat 4.9.1-11)] on linux > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>>> import sys >>>> sys.path = [ '/usr/lib64/python2.7' ] + sys.path Interesting for intellectual curiosity, but not particularly significant. All you prove is that the 2.7 stdlib is designed for compatibility with older 2.x Pythons (or, looking the other way, nobody wants pointless code churn in working code). The best way to write 2/3 compatible code is to write 3.x code first. Then just adhere to a few simple rules (eg always subclass object), and the bulk of your code will work just fine. You might need to toss in some explicit __future__ directives (print_function if you don't stick to "exactly one string argument to print", and division if you don't want to have to worry about the differences), and if you do this a lot, you might want to pick up the 'six' library or equivalent, but other than that, there's really not much to deal with. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python discussed in Nature Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-02-12 19:46 +1100
Re: Python discussed in Nature Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-02-12 09:19 +0000
Re: Python discussed in Nature wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-02-12 01:31 -0800
Re: Python discussed in Nature Fabien <fabien.maussion@gmail.com> - 2015-02-12 12:07 +0100
Re: Python discussed in Nature Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-02-12 13:25 +0200
Re: Python discussed in Nature Fabien <fabien.maussion@gmail.com> - 2015-02-12 12:33 +0100
Re: Python discussed in Nature Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-02-12 16:39 +0200
Re: Python discussed in Nature Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-13 02:59 +1100
Re: Python discussed in Nature Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-02-12 18:56 +0200
Re: Python discussed in Nature Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-13 04:08 +1100
Re: Python discussed in Nature Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-02-13 14:07 +1100
Re: Python discussed in Nature Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> - 2015-02-13 23:58 +0100
Re: Python discussed in Nature wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-02-14 00:39 -0800
Re: Python discussed in Nature John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-02-12 10:29 -0800
Re: Python discussed in Nature Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-13 05:37 +1100
Re: Python discussed in Nature wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-02-13 02:03 -0800
Re: Python discussed in Nature Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-02-13 14:11 +1100
Re: Python discussed in Nature wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-02-12 23:05 -0800
Re: Python discussed in Nature John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-02-13 11:40 -0800
Re: Python discussed in Nature Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-14 09:45 +1100
Re: Python discussed in Nature giacomo boffi <pecore@pascolo.net> - 2015-02-15 22:09 +0100
Re: Python discussed in Nature Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-16 09:16 +1100
Re: Python discussed in Nature Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-02-12 20:07 -0800
Re: Python discussed in Nature Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-02-13 00:24 -0500
Re: Python discussed in Nature wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-02-12 23:02 -0800
Re: Python discussed in Nature wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-02-13 01:36 -0800
Re: Python discussed in Nature Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-02-12 10:48 -0800
csiph-web