Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #85565
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!bcyclone04.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone04.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.077 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.85; '*S*': 0.00; 'lost.': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'mean,': 0.16; 'subject:def': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'replacing': 0.19; 'thu,': 0.19; 'feb': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'statement': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'work.': 0.31; '"",': 0.31; 'implicit': 0.31; "can't": 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.38; '12,': 0.39; 'called': 0.40; 'ian': 0.60; 'name': 0.63; 'such': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'started.': 0.68; 'lack': 0.78; '2015': 0.84; 'subject:Alternative': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=Ue5dB1Xsqnw4HtCLXlLYs5jd9lGlC3hAfM5e2HasDzE=; b=sEv88U7/6iqnOrx2azFbEDnzvilGDbZcMAjUq++uESsj12mNNvJ6m6mu20Ujh9S+5T OXWITXO3aRo27GjzF/vSb4El8pJagxN/eMpOucJgym0slouDySDy+OzSQDT1SQWje3BL r4dGcujxvEt1EfsRb5sB+vlXftKiRUkfHNdj80D7jXJzOeg5wuWQdQt0Vd7si0gTr5Bq yufOACHQY18aooaFATPy+rO3nDaP7ZwKrKjY1uXObwM8VFsa4onYlv9tX9PBpn8M6fmc 3xMJxOrdwPcBmn5MgNM2E0ijqnH1+bbcI0D8Ipu38NWhRJyk8TRRgjUqwVmC+SWnPAt8 sMkg== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Received | by 10.42.52.200 with SMTP id k8mr6580787icg.26.1423713372652; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:56:12 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <CALwzidkQ4uoya63r6ugeTnG3egJHL0XbUQFLK1iQFZGVJNgyYg@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <CAPTjJmrAQgtauH74dwCzb_-6T09D0dLVkxiGrAxJMp_OOwgS0g@mail.gmail.com> <54C3EAD1.2010501@stoneleaf.us> <CAPTjJmohdQbK9_ikh8heaMRbpJ270UW6C1AE2oNVgV_4AoYfQg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.18121.1422151185.18130.python-list@python.org> <54db5356$0$3915$e4fe514c@dreader34.news.xs4all.nl> <mbh1r8$3eb$1@ger.gmane.org> <CALwzidkQ4uoya63r6ugeTnG3egJHL0XbUQFLK1iQFZGVJNgyYg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Date | Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:56:12 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Cc | Python <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.18679.1423713376.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 13 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1423713376 news.xs4all.nl 2837 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41342 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| X-Received-Bytes | 3848 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 3387326176 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:85565 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote: > The reason I don't like this replacing def isn't because the name is > necessarily lost. It's because the lack of the well-defined def > statement encourages more complex usages like > > functions['f'] = x -> x**2 > > where such implicit transformations won't work. That's actually where this started. I mean, if a function can be called "<lambda>", why can't it be called "functions['f']"? ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-01-24 17:58 -0800
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Yawar Amin <yawar.amin@gmail.com> - 2015-01-24 18:30 -0800
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-01-25 15:27 +1100
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Yawar Amin <yawar.amin@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 17:26 -0800
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-01-26 13:46 +1100
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-02-11 13:04 +0000
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Clarence <clarence1126@gmail.com> - 2015-02-11 06:28 -0800
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-02-11 08:52 -0800
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-02-11 21:06 -0500
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-02-11 19:57 -0700
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-12 14:56 +1100
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-02-12 09:17 -0700
csiph-web