Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #85563
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.019 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'assignment': 0.07; 'compiler': 0.07; 'parser': 0.07; 'transform': 0.07; 'lost.': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:def': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; 'replacing': 0.19; 'feb': 0.22; 'issue.': 0.22; 'byte': 0.24; 'recognize': 0.24; 'purposes': 0.26; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'function': 0.29; 'statement': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'work.': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'implicit': 0.31; 'could': 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'easily': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'simple': 0.61; 'name': 0.63; 'such': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'lack': 0.78; '2015': 0.84; 'subject:Alternative': 0.84; 'generation.': 0.91 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=XCvIjgZFTvL/s6ikKquCcgHlXmkdxNUmlwG2VUGQO3Q=; b=JnFl0v24XECZK6bB1J3ug4fitBXyxMBC0AgsEFgdhetDC65HKJaYUmPE+4xueI8Eue Yg7gipeRnHo9RZXLrdE99wPU0snSXXHfiC9FYowtIePA0Php257D01YI+bkwh5ujV/jX jwxZkaAlYB9yMyD0Ex8IGxcxcqQEqoXfDCovVUjMKM3ShpnHMrlcdLAOI36zOqPx2Lw3 dLiTJoaKXEJ1gXblDtdb2v0XwAQSCBk2uquMkOTbc923DlsLI06mAzYRP9+xLT1ALub1 Gwjta9QmNrW2kUGPHlEx4TPRlL4e6Yl+kWOziVpSG1i3HzWsMRX7dQgVa+PVkWr1Zo44 xu5A== |
| X-Received | by 10.66.141.71 with SMTP id rm7mr2751619pab.114.1423709881155; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:58:01 -0800 (PST) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <mbh1r8$3eb$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| References | <CAPTjJmrAQgtauH74dwCzb_-6T09D0dLVkxiGrAxJMp_OOwgS0g@mail.gmail.com> <54C3EAD1.2010501@stoneleaf.us> <CAPTjJmohdQbK9_ikh8heaMRbpJ270UW6C1AE2oNVgV_4AoYfQg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.18121.1422151185.18130.python-list@python.org> <54db5356$0$3915$e4fe514c@dreader34.news.xs4all.nl> <mbh1r8$3eb$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:57:20 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements |
| To | Python <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.18677.1423709889.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 25 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1423709889 news.xs4all.nl 2868 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60279 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:85563 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
>> I can't see why the parser would understand more easily
>>
>> def f(x):
>> return x**2
>> than
>>
>> f = x->
>> return x**2
>
>
> The parser parses both equally well. That is not the issue.
The compiler could at some point recognize that the function is being
assigned to a simple name and transform the assignment into a def for
purposes of byte code generation. It could also do the same with
lambda, although it currently doesn't.
The reason I don't like this replacing def isn't because the name is
necessarily lost. It's because the lack of the well-defined def
statement encourages more complex usages like
functions['f'] = x -> x**2
where such implicit transformations won't work.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-01-24 17:58 -0800
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Yawar Amin <yawar.amin@gmail.com> - 2015-01-24 18:30 -0800
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-01-25 15:27 +1100
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Yawar Amin <yawar.amin@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 17:26 -0800
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-01-26 13:46 +1100
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-02-11 13:04 +0000
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Clarence <clarence1126@gmail.com> - 2015-02-11 06:28 -0800
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-02-11 08:52 -0800
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-02-11 21:06 -0500
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-02-11 19:57 -0700
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-12 14:56 +1100
Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-02-12 09:17 -0700
csiph-web