Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #7539
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.008 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.01; 'parameter': 0.05; 'subject:two': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'subject:compare': 0.09; 'computing': 0.11; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; "'real": 0.16; 'angelico': 0.16; 'cmp': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'ha!': 0.16; 'list;': 0.16; 'python-list,': 0.16; 'subject:similar': 0.16; 'things.': 0.16; 'mon,': 0.17; 'tue,': 0.17; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'here?': 0.23; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.23; 'received:mail-iy0-f174.google.com': 0.23; 'there.': 0.25; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'are.': 0.29; 'bit': 0.30; 'fairly': 0.30; 'joined': 0.32; 'posts': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'together.': 0.33; 'list.': 0.33; 'chris': 0.34; 'there': 0.35; 'posters': 0.35; 'subject:What': 0.35; 'quite': 0.36; 'difference': 0.37; 'subject:lists': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'floating': 0.37; 'thread': 0.37; 'put': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'think': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'got': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'training': 0.60; 'more': 0.60; 'huge': 0.62; 'day,': 0.64; 'removal': 0.65; 'high': 0.67; 'traffic': 0.70; 'taught': 0.72; 'soon': 0.73; 'learned': 0.73; 'something.': 0.91; 'touched': 0.91; 'informative.': 0.96 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SsTKcmCwKbQq4Ayp8ddl6173luaDkmitfI8rgOSJSXs=; b=P7NgMzRSsNW4MCB97cT7JCoBjsB8GfQUJT7aJla3B07YVoTX4c7PNb+xyNZeyxLzKH ow9P6GuPZ5Uj82vY8WLviIVDDAAiupKNmhwlhyWOzotIbQu5lOyXBW0Nf+VbhWxd/Zv3 cjgyFjl1R2pxuvvrPRjE/cbMAnmyzvHQlrXxA= |
| DomainKey-Signature | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=emXYMFSva4NZbcTzxIvURM4BlW8QECmzVey371FOu4WuYbR4a1wfk0gJsOoyJ4xk3b 4qS+W6D3JjkKvk6i9wRoJwt7IwZAQIipwwhrpu5ou8qJztMQiv3JFlbQMFhpkNSzFgg0 GXMk+gB7qm9D1rNwW7SmG9/bLghbS8pmicqsg= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <BANLkTikAWWG1zJg2J5U0rbJMyiGy5g0_aA@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <3ff2f4cc-7c26-4f59-9463-d6f0874174d8@dn9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <mailman.169.1307977750.11593.python-list@python.org> <bad3a56e-efba-4ef4-a159-64273cda5a08@gh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <mailman.176.1307979593.11593.python-list@python.org> <4df634f0$0$30002$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <BANLkTi=gomVpef-VxCGjnwPq0YnrM7Uz-w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikAWWG1zJg2J5U0rbJMyiGy5g0_aA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Date | Tue, 14 Jun 2011 03:50:14 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.186.1307987418.11593.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 21 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 82.94.164.166 |
| X-Trace | 1307987418 news.xs4all.nl 49175 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:46374 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:7539 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:46 AM, geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ha! That *lengthy* thread started fairly soon after I joined this >> list. It was highly... informative. I learned a bit about Python, and >> a lot about python-list, from the posts there. > > So what are we talking about here? Reduce? There was a huge thread about the removal of the cmp parameter to sort() in Python 3.x. It was quite a wide-ranging discussion, touched on many things. I think it got up to 90 posts in the first day, or something. The main thing it taught me was that python-list is a high traffic list; the next most important thing was who the courteous posters are. In contrast, the thread on NaNs in Python has taught me more about the difference between floating point and 'real numbers' in a week or two than all my previous computing training put together. Yep, this is an interesting list. Chris Angelico
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Zachary Dziura <zcdziura@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 07:58 -0700
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 01:09 +1000
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Zachary Dziura <zcdziura@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 08:21 -0700
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 01:39 +1000
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-06-13 16:04 +0000
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 02:30 +1000
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 10:46 -0700
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 03:50 +1000
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 11:20 -0700
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 04:24 +1000
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-06-13 12:11 -0700
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Zachary Dziura <zcdziura@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 12:21 -0700
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 07:33 +1000
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 04:11 +1000
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Chris Torek <nospam@torek.net> - 2011-06-13 18:40 +0000
Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 04:12 +1000
csiph-web