Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #11792

Re: List spam

References <DC1EB7A8F4C3584EBCC2DB22D543B552A74454@aaqexchange.aaq.hfecorp.local> <0A9E373A-AA62-4DD4-83B9-B4424037BF6B@semanchuk.com> <CAK--mtqFwH5PD6tkbGZQkTJEqEWgNp=4Q4R9xaxSTFBG0aNpqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmo0X25KfudpERPMXeBd3S=3X-ReDs__aq19-vVib6z1Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date 2011-08-19 04:00 +1000
Subject Re: List spam
From Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.184.1313690458.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


5963 unread emails.

Thanks python-list + other mailing-lists!

My recommendation to you is to setup a different account for your
mailing-lists. Alternatively setup some mail rules.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Ghodmode <ghodmode@ghodmode.com> wrote:
>> Make an effort to curb the spam even if it means killing the newsgroup
>> availability.  Choose mailman or Google Groups, or another single
>> solution.  Make it members only, but allow anyone to register with an
>> automated confirmation email and a CAPTCHA.  Appoint a list admin who
>> has a few minutes each day to scan subjects of emails for spammers and
>> remove them from the members list.
>>
>
> Unfortunately spammers can create email addresses very quickly, and
> CAPTCHAs are inherently weak (even the best of them are easily cracked
> by the Chinese human "botnets"). However, I wouldn't be against a
> system of spam filtering with three levels: Not Spam, gets straight
> onto the list; Definite Spam, gets deleted; and Dubious, which gets
> dropped into a mod's basket.
>
> ChrisA
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: List spam Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2011-08-19 04:00 +1000

csiph-web