Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #58109
| References | <mailman.1793.1383108900.18130.python-list@python.org> <1626628321404821598.534803patrick.vrijlandt-gmail.com@newszilla.xs4all.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-31 07:19 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: personal library |
| From | Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1839.1383164391.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 31 October 2013 07:02, patrick vrijlandt <patrick.vrijlandt@gmail.com>wrote: > Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> > wrote: > >> Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >>> *Definitely* use source control. > >> > >> +1, but prefer to call it a “version control system” which is (a) more > >> easily searched on the internet, and (b) somewhat more accurate. > > > > Right. I've picked up some bad habits, and I think Dave may also > > have... but yes, "distributed version control system" is what I'm > > talking about here. > > > > ChrisA > > Thanks. Do you all agree that Mercurial is the way to go, or is there > another "distributed version control system" that I should shortlist? There are huge arguments all over the net on this topic. Having extensively used the top two contenders (Git and Mercurial) I would strongly advise you to use Mercurial. What it comes down to for me is that Mercurial usage fits in my head and I rarely have to go to the docs, whereas with Git I have to constantly go to the docs for anything but the most trivial usage - even when it's something I've done many times before. I'm always afraid that I'm going to do something *wrong* in Git. Tim Delaney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
personal library patrick vrijlandt <patrick.vrijlandt@gmail.com> - 2013-10-29 21:29 +0000
Re: personal library Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-10-30 02:00 +0000
Re: personal library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-30 15:26 +1100
Re: personal library Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2013-10-30 06:31 +0000
Re: personal library Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-10-30 15:33 +1100
Re: personal library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-30 15:48 +1100
Re: personal library patrick vrijlandt <patrick.vrijlandt@gmail.com> - 2013-10-30 20:02 +0000
Re: personal library Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney@gmail.com> - 2013-10-31 07:19 +1100
Re: personal library Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-10-31 07:37 +1100
Re: personal library Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-10-30 21:52 +0100
Re: personal library paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk - 2013-10-30 20:34 +0000
Re: personal library Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-10-30 21:08 +0000
Re: personal library Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-30 21:20 +0000
Re: personal library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-31 08:31 +1100
Re: personal library patrick vrijlandt <patrick.vrijlandt@gmail.com> - 2013-10-31 21:48 +0000
Re: personal library Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney@gmail.com> - 2013-10-31 08:43 +1100
Re: personal library Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney@gmail.com> - 2013-10-31 08:45 +1100
Re: personal library rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-10-31 20:38 -0700
csiph-web