Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #84992
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.001 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'argument': 0.05; 'intermediate': 0.07; 'nested': 0.07; 'string': 0.09; 'generators': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:parsing': 0.09; 'translate': 0.10; 'api': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; 'language,': 0.12; 'mostly': 0.14; "'foobar'": 0.16; 'accepts': 0.16; 'innermost': 0.16; 'levels,': 0.16; 'operates': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'simpler': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'options': 0.25; 'skip:" 30': 0.26; 'pass': 0.26; 'skip:" 20': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'gives': 0.31; 'seemingly': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'text': 0.33; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'common': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'advertised': 0.36; 'yield': 0.36; 'being': 0.38; 'initially': 0.38; 'question,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'most': 0.60; 'simply': 0.61; 'different': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'direct': 0.67; 'reverse': 0.68; 'obvious': 0.74; 'clip': 0.84; 'more:': 0.84; 'substrings': 0.84; 'approach.': 0.91; 'wait,': 0.93 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
| Subject | Re: parsing tree from excel sheet |
| Date | Sun, 01 Feb 2015 11:11:31 +0100 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <cirqviF15qtU1@mid.individual.net> <mailman.18217.1422454096.18130.python-list@python.org> <cj1kt9Fi3e0U1@mid.individual.net> <mailman.18314.1422637907.18130.python-list@python.org> <cj547rFfl2sU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | p57bd9e61.dip0.t-ipconnect.de |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.13.3 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.18356.1422785505.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 74 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1422785505 news.xs4all.nl 2926 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48530 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!bete-des-vosges.org!feed.ac-versailles.fr!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:84992 |
Show key headers only | View raw
alb wrote: >> But wait, "".join() only accepts strings so let's change >> >>yield [node] >> >> to >>yield [node.name] # str(node) would also work > > Again my question, why not simply yield node.name? I've been conditioned to build a string from many substrings like so >>> parts = ["foo", "bar", "baz"] >>> text = "".join(parts) >>> text 'foobarbaz' instead of >>> text = "" >>> for part in parts: ... text += part ... >>> text 'foobarbaz' mostly because ""join(...) was initially advertised as being faster than +=. For nested generators or functions this translates into >>> def outer_list(): ... return ["foo"] + inner_list() ... >>> def inner_list(): ... return ["bar"] ... >>> "".join(outer_list()) 'foobar' instead of the obvious >>> def outer(): ... return "foo" + inner() ... >>> def inner(): ... return "bar" ... >>> outer() 'foobar' Here the list-based approach may build many intermediate throwaway-lists, so it's most likely less efficient than direct string concatenation. In return it gives you flexibility: >>> "/".join(outer_list()) 'foo/bar' >>> "-->".join(outer_list()) 'foo-->bar' You'd have to pass the separator as an argument to outer/inner() to achieve this with the seemingly simpler approach. But there's more: You can reverse the order, >>> ":".join(reversed(outer_list())) 'bar:foo' treat the innermost string differently, translate each part into a different language, clip common levels, etc. Your options are unlimited. I never understood why the file system API operates on a single string...
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
parsing tree from excel sheet al.basili@gmail.com (alb) - 2015-01-28 10:12 +0000
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-01-28 15:08 +0100
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet al.basili@gmail.com (alb) - 2015-01-28 14:27 +0000
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet al.basili@gmail.com (alb) - 2015-01-29 21:02 +0000
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-01-29 21:16 +0000
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet al.basili@gmail.com (alb) - 2015-01-29 21:32 +0000
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-01-29 21:59 +0000
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2015-01-29 14:30 -0800
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-01-30 10:46 +1100
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet al.basili@gmail.com (alb) - 2015-01-30 15:05 +0000
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-01-30 18:11 +0100
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet al.basili@gmail.com (alb) - 2015-01-31 22:45 +0000
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-02-01 11:11 +0100
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-01-30 18:24 +0100
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-01-31 10:07 +0100
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-01-31 10:07 +0100
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2015-01-28 08:13 -0600
Re: parsing tree from excel sheet al.basili@gmail.com (alb) - 2015-01-29 21:22 +0000
csiph-web