Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #84832
| Date | 2015-01-29 09:49 -0800 |
|---|---|
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| Subject | Re: The Most Diabolical Python Antipattern |
| References | <madpuv$he7$1@ger.gmane.org> <CANc-5Uy-B4GsUHbRX+KyH+uE06WXMDs5-Mf_S7uH0PYWiZ0HVw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.18275.1422554318.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 01/29/2015 09:36 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >> ... but what do you guys and gals think? > > I saw that blog referenced elsewhere a day or two ago. I think he's > correct. There are the occasional instance where I need to recover > from an exception no matter what caused it. In cases where I fail to > report the traceback somewhere, I'm often left scratching my head. I agree -- worst practice. > In my mind, this is approximately as bad as an external library > (silently) calling exit(). Yeah, I hate when that happens. I hate it even more when it's my own library. :/ (yeah, I fixed that!) -- ~Ethan~
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The Most Diabolical Python Antipattern Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-01-29 09:49 -0800
csiph-web