Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #84615
| References | (4 earlier) <ta4ipbx9j3.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> <mailman.18151.1422288861.18130.python-list@python.org> <qotioft4iao.fsf@ruuvi.it.helsinki.fi> <ma5ssj$ars$1@ger.gmane.org> <CALwzid=rzENxp3GHQbcu5WrnFesEJQFD==DDfrDC=EcX4=_WjQ@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2015-01-26 11:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.18156.1422296837.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote: > $ python3 -m timeit 't = (1000, 2000, 3000)' > 100000000 loops, best of 3: 0.0147 usec per loop > $ python3 -m timeit 't = [1000, 2000, 3000]' > 10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.0678 usec per loop > $ python3 -m timeit 't = tuple(range(10000))' > 10000 loops, best of 3: 183 usec per loop > $ python3 -m timeit 't = list(range(10000))' > 10000 loops, best of 3: 174 usec per loop > $ python3 -m timeit 't = tuple(range(10000000))' > 10 loops, best of 3: 323 msec per loop > $ python3 -m timeit 't = list(range(10000000))' > 10 loops, best of 3: 306 msec per loop > > This is probably a result of the use of freelists to avoid > reallocating the tuple objects, though. I don't see any substantial > difference in access time: Whoops. Actually it's a result of the 3-element tuple being a constant in the code object. If we use the constructor, the difference mostly goes away. $ python3 -m timeit 't = tuple(range(1000, 4000, 1000))' 1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.559 usec per loop $ python3 -m timeit 't = list(range(1000, 4000, 1000))' 1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.585 usec per loop
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2015-01-09 14:44 +0000
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2015-01-09 08:57 -0600
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2015-01-09 15:25 +0000
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-01-09 10:12 -0500
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2015-01-26 13:43 +0000
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-01-26 15:04 +0100
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2015-01-26 15:50 +0000
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-01-26 09:13 -0700
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2015-01-26 18:29 +0200
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-01-26 17:18 +0000
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-01-26 11:23 -0700
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-01-26 11:26 -0700
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2015-01-09 16:50 +0100
Re: Why does argparse return None instead of [] if an append action isn't used? Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2015-01-26 13:43 +0000
csiph-web