Re: [OT] absolute vs. relative URI

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.04; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'committing': 0.09; 'indication': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'statements': 0.09; 'way:': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'language.': 0.14; '24,': 0.16; 'chris,': 0.16; 'deprecated,': 0.16; 'deprecated.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'relevant.': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'subject:] ': 0.20; 'seems': 0.21; 'machine': 0.22; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'url:bugs': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'statement': 0.30; 'maintaining': 0.32; 'another': 0.32; 'says': 0.33; 'url:python': 0.33; 'johnson': 0.35; 'url:org': 0.36; 'clear': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'tell': 0.60; "you're": 0.61; 'our': 0.64; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'subject:. ': 0.67; '2015': 0.84; 'dent': 0.84; 'rick': 0.93; 'serious': 0.97
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject	Re: [OT] absolute vs. relative URI
Date	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:22:40 +0000
References	<m9tmt8$hbn$1@reader1.panix.com> <87twzh34r6.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <m9tq24$1pu$1@reader1.panix.com> <CAMw+j7+EWX+K_c1a368fA5b6BERv0Ah0SxOd-=HkPiVqdt970g@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.18045.1422035333.18130.python-list@python.org> <53547444-2dd1-4b50-a5ad-0fd162a51ab1@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmoH+OKEsXZ1fKxEv2DiJdb00z8Cs0x6hXOhiRZJFtL8yw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	host-92-24-222-48.ppp.as43234.net
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
In-Reply-To	<CAPTjJmoH+OKEsXZ1fKxEv2DiJdb00z8Cs0x6hXOhiRZJFtL8yw@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.18060.1422044574.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	27
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1422044574 news.xs4all.nl 2847 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33778
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:84397

Show key headers only | View raw

On 23/01/2015 19:46, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Rick Johnson
> <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It's not deprecated, and never will be;
>>
>> Chris, what do you call a statement that is based on an
>> un-provable premise? Oh and, GvR told me to tell you that he
>> wants his time machine back, and if it has even one dent
>> you're going to be in some serious trouble!
>
> Statements from the BDFL committing to maintaining it *at least* until
> Python 4000, with clear indication that it is most definitely not
> deprecated. Or, looking at it another way: If you want to disagree
> with me, find a statement in current, official documentation that says
> that it's deprecated.
>
> ChrisA
>

This http://bugs.python.org/issue14123 seems relevant.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Thread

[OT] absolute vs. relative URI Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-23 14:47 +0000
  Re: [OT] absolute vs. relative URI Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-01-23 17:18 +0200
    Re: [OT] absolute vs. relative URI Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-23 15:40 +0000
      Re: [OT] absolute vs. relative URI Chris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> - 2015-01-23 17:00 +0100
        Re: [OT] absolute vs. relative URI Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-23 17:10 +0000
      Re: [OT] absolute vs. relative URI Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-01-24 04:48 +1100
        Re: [OT] absolute vs. relative URI Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-01-23 11:02 -0800
          Re: [OT] absolute vs. relative URI Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-01-24 06:46 +1100
          Re: [OT] absolute vs. relative URI Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-01-23 20:22 +0000
  Re: [OT] absolute vs. relative URI Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-01-24 04:55 +1100
  Re: [OT] absolute vs. relative URI Tony the Tiger <tony@tiger.invalid> - 2015-01-23 18:21 +0000

csiph-web