Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #30719
| Date | 2012-10-04 08:21 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Benjamin Jessup <bsj@abzinc.com> |
| Organization | ABZ, Inc. |
| Subject | Re: fastest data structure for retrieving objects identified by (x, y) tuple? |
| References | <mailman.6344.1349324402.27097.python-list@python.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1793.1349353325.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 10/4/2012 12:20 AM, python-list-request@python.org wrote:
> How do you know that?
>
> No offence, but if you can't even work out whether lookups in a dict or a
> list are faster, I can't imagine why you think you can intuit what the
> fastest way to retrieve the nearest neighbours would be.
Whats wrong with the test below?
# randomly select matrix coordinates to look-up
from random import randrange
test_coords = []
for i in range(1000):
x = randrange(2400); y = randrange(2400); test_coords.append((x, y))
# build objects
class Object():pass
obj1 = Object(); obj2 = Object(); obj1.up = obj2
# build some test code
from timeit import Timer
setup = "from __main__ import test_coords, obj1, obj2"
t = Timer("for p in test_coords: obj = obj1.up", setup)
# run the test code
print(min(t.repeat(number=10000, repeat=7)))
import platform
print(platform.python_version())
On my system, I get:
0.719622326348
2.7.1
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: fastest data structure for retrieving objects identified by (x, y) tuple? Benjamin Jessup <bsj@abzinc.com> - 2012-10-04 08:21 -0400 Re: fastest data structure for retrieving objects identified by (x, y) tuple? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-04 14:04 +0000
csiph-web