Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #84048
| References | <CAG=hEY1L-39EmuWpdEh_n-BNfs=qG9nL=MrMT0ar72yGBrkoUA@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-19 16:49 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Trees |
| From | Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.17875.1421715305.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Zachary Gilmartin <zacharygilmartin@gmail.com> wrote: > Why aren't there trees in the python standard library? Trees are kind of specialized datastructures; no one type of tree solves all tree-related problems suitably well. I think probably the most common need for a tree is implementing a cache, but most times you're tempted to sort inside a loop you're better off with a tree. I've put some time into python trees; most of them are on pypi and at: http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~dstromberg/datastructures/ and: http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/python-tree-and-heap-comparison/ HTH
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Trees Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2015-01-19 16:49 -0800
csiph-web