Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #91452

Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table.

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'bits': 0.07; 'interpreted': 0.07; '-1.': 0.09; 'bit...': 0.09; 'bool': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'spelling': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '>in': 0.16; '>on': 0.16; 'boolean': 0.16; 'message-id:@4ax.com': 0.16; 'operators,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'sorts': 0.16; 'suggested,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'comparing': 0.18; 'instance,': 0.18; 'odd': 0.18; 'subject:need': 0.18; 'url:home': 0.18; 'tests': 0.18; '>>>': 0.20; 'handling': 0.20; '(or': 0.21; 'do.': 0.22; 'meant': 0.22; 'subject:problem': 0.22; '2015': 0.23; "python's": 0.23; 'slightly': 0.23; 'signed': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'chris': 0.26; '+0000': 0.27; 'possibility': 0.27; 'least': 0.27; 'said,': 0.27; 'comparison': 0.29; 'consequence': 0.29; 'convention': 0.31; 'fri,': 0.31; 'error.': 0.31; 'though,': 0.32; 'common': 0.33; 'true.': 0.33; 'languages': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.35; 'next': 0.35; 'done': 0.35; 'false': 0.35; 'there': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.37; 'skip:z 10': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'easily': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'even': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'today,': 0.62; 'safe': 0.63; 'different': 0.64; '(utc),': 0.84; '+1000,': 0.84; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'dennis': 0.91; 'received:108': 0.93; 'tricky': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com>
Subject Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table.
Date Fri, 29 May 2015 08:48:59 -0400
Organization IISS Elusive Unicorn
References <1432869619.871453.281061217.70B58077@webmail.messagingengine.com> <mailman.154.1432871339.5151.python-list@python.org> <mk9j9i$ejd$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host adsl-108-79-216-129.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net
X-Newsreader Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
X-No-Archive YES
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.177.1432903758.5151.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 32
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1432903758 news.xs4all.nl 2946 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46440
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:91452

Show key headers only | View raw


On Fri, 29 May 2015 11:41:38 +0000 (UTC), alister
<alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> declaimed the following:

>On Fri, 29 May 2015 13:48:55 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:20 PM,  <random832@fastmail.us> wrote:
>>> The possibility of spelling these with the comparison operators, as
>>> some have suggested, is a consequence of Python's implementation where
>>> True == 1 and False == 0. In other languages bool may not be relatable
>>> (or at least not orderable), or False may be == -1.
>> 
>> True. That said, though, using 0 for False and 1 for True is easily the
>> most common convention in use today, and the next most likely case is
>> that comparing booleans would give a simple and immediate error. So it's
>> most likely to be safe to do. Cross-language compatibility is a tricky
>> thing anyway; there are all sorts of odd edge cases, even with
>> otherwise-similar languages (Pike and Python, for instance, have
>> slightly different handling of slice ranges), so anything that's done in
>> Python is meant to be interpreted with Python semantics.
>> 
>> ChrisA
>
>in the past True has even been -1 with 0 as false
>(all bits set in a signed integer)

	And in VAX/VMS system return codes, odd numbers were "success/info" and
even numbers "failure/warning" -- and VAX F77 did Boolean tests on just the
least significant bit... So it wasn't even just a case of zero/non-zero.
-- 
	Wulfraed                 Dennis Lee Bieber         AF6VN
    wlfraed@ix.netcom.com    HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-29 13:48 +1000
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2015-05-29 11:41 +0000
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-05-29 08:48 -0400

csiph-web