Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #90969

Re: subprocess.Popen zombie

Show all headers | View raw

On 20/05/2015 16:42, Alain Ketterlin wrote:
> Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> writes:
.............
>> The code I used to use with os.spawnl was even worse in leaving
>> zombies around.
>
> For the same reason (os.wait() and os.waitpid() let you ... wait for
> child-processes).
>
>> I suppose I needed to keep a record of all the pid's and wait on them
>> at some convenient time.
>
> Yes.
>
>> The subprocess version appears to be doing that for me somehow.
>
> Not sure what you mean. You have to do the bookkeeping yourself.
It seems there is some notion of book keeping in subprocess.py
Popen instances have a __del__ method which records  un-norwegian live instances 
in a module global _active

if self.returncode is None and _active is not None:
     # Child is still running, keep us alive until we can wait on it.
    _active.append(self)


when another Popen is created there's a call to _cleanup which processes that 
list and reaps those that can be raptured.


>
> (But, does beep really take so much time that you can't just call() it?)
>
not really, it's just normal to keep event routines short; the routine which 
beeps is after detection of the cat's entrance into the house and various 
recognition schemes have pronounced intruder :)

Probably should all have gone into a separate thread, but I dislike threaded 
code and I would probably get into trouble with the PyQT event loop.

> -- Alain.
>


-- 
Robin Becker

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

subprocess.Popen zombie Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> - 2015-05-20 14:16 +0100
  Re: subprocess.Popen zombie Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-20 16:48 +0200
  Re: subprocess.Popen zombie Alain Ketterlin <alain@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid> - 2015-05-20 17:42 +0200
    Re: subprocess.Popen zombie Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> - 2015-05-20 17:44 +0100
      Re: subprocess.Popen zombie Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2015-05-21 08:35 +0200
        Re: subprocess.Popen zombie Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-21 08:13 -0600

csiph-web