Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #30671

Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <maniandram01@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.004
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'python': 0.09; 'immutable': 0.09; 'iterate': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'mutable': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'bug': 0.10; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.10; 'language': 0.14; "can't.": 0.16; 'mark,': 0.16; 'simple.': 0.16; 'storing': 0.16; 'subject:sub': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'tuples': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'monday,': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'feature': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'question': 0.27; 'besides': 0.27; 'post': 0.28; "i'm": 0.29; 'certain': 0.33; 'raising': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'lists.': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'add': 0.36; 'method': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'october': 0.37; 'does': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'talk': 0.38; 'several': 0.39; 'list,': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'worth': 0.63; 'talking': 0.66; 'received:209.85.213.184': 0.91; 'received :mail-yx0-f184.google.com': 0.91; 'convinced': 0.93
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Date Tue, 2 Oct 2012 20:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <mailman.1732.1349196199.27098.python-list@python.org>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=122.167.89.200; posting-account=uPFZNQoAAAAm9w7z13q1SjWNKNjztdcD
References <mailman.1636.1348935354.27098.python-list@python.org> <040cf4f0-e6de-45b1-add4-462c02fc2c7f@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1700.1349079470.27098.python-list@python.org> <e895bf8b-514b-4dc2-a43e-50de4f9c3a9e@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1732.1349196199.27098.python-list@python.org>
User-Agent G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client true
X-Google-IP 122.167.89.200
MIME-Version 1.0
Subject Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements
From Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com>
To comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Message-ID <mailman.1751.1349234486.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 88
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1349234486 news.xs4all.nl 6865 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39951
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:30671

Show key headers only | View raw

On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 22:13:20 UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence  wrote:
> On 02/10/2012 17:12, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
> 
> > On Monday, 1 October 2012 13:47:50 UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence  wrote:
> 
> >> On 01/10/2012 01:58, 88888 Dihedral wrote:
> 
> >>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>
> 
> >>> Your question seems vague to me. If you know you are storing
> 
> >>
> 
> >>> only immutable tuples in a list, then the way to iterate is simple.
> 
> >>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>
> 
> >>
> 
> >>
> 
> >> Does Python have a magic method that let's me use mutable tuples?  I'd
> 
> >>
> 
> >> also like immutable lists.  Is it worth raising a feature request on the
> 
> >>
> 
> >> bug tracker?
> 
> >>
> 
> >>
> 
> >>
> 
> >> --
> 
> >>
> 
> >> Cheers.
> 
> >>
> 
> >>
> 
> >>
> 
> >> Mark Lawrence.
> 
> >
> 
> > Mark, you are talking to a bot.
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> What happened to freedom of speech?  If I want to talk to a bot, I'll 
> 
> talk to a bot.  Besides I'm not convinced it/he/she is a bot.  Plus if 
> 
> you read my post carefully, add in several years experience of Python 
> 
> the language and Python the comedy, you might come to the conclusion 
> 
> that a certain amount of urine extraction was going on :)
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> 
> 
> Mark Lawrence.

Never said you can't.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Thomas Bach <thbach@students.uni-mainz.de> - 2012-09-29 18:14 +0200
  Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-29 09:26 -0700
    Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Thomas Bach <thbach@students.uni-mainz.de> - 2012-09-29 18:44 +0200
  Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-30 17:58 -0700
    Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-01 09:19 +0100
      Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 09:12 -0700
        Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-02 17:44 +0100
          Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 20:21 -0700
          Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 20:21 -0700
        Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-03 03:58 +1000
          Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-03 00:57 +0000
            Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-02 18:11 -0700
              Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-03 01:24 +0000
                Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-02 18:42 -0700
        Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-02 19:35 +0100
        Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-10-02 14:59 -0400
      Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 09:12 -0700
      Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-02 13:54 -0700
      Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-02 13:54 -0700
  Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-30 17:58 -0700

csiph-web