Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #83382

Re: Can numpy do better than this?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.006
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; '16,': 0.03; '21,': 0.07; '22,': 0.09; '34,': 0.09; '40,': 0.09; 'constructor': 0.09; 'jan': 0.12; '23,': 0.16; '24],': 0.16; '32,': 0.16; '33,': 0.16; '39,': 0.16; 'array.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; '15,': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'skip:t 40': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; '14,': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'expression': 0.60; 'skip:n 30': 0.60; 'subject:Can': 0.60; '20,': 0.68; '26,': 0.68; 'subject:this': 0.83; '2015': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=+x4cof64npFKI3Vk1VQC2Fs7pyoaTIpTzoDNj84YQec=; b=LTz7AZeMV+c8sXhKc5q2pawbim67BNUwT6U1Zgx2XM03c9LOqEZdJTDard7/G+QYxB Z6lbQmMHtjf5HDVUbN98HPNS89llsCWV0WFFX/xI/DzezOB9sGqQnhxvv7V4tjtCJD/5 +o0iOGCD6OOWCMrKdr7yMHvLJTQUCP54eX5R0e3oAnHWfFIt96K0ZGU5Af7GFt1k4tXp Rg+R7j9BHwms7k3UcVRpLffNPnGhGCSv+f8i+Hwy5OUaQida9wjYWx70DcPouUJhhVPw iXwvIUIINlGBmJuimVip5D+w7d89MslzlZ7qIds0kmPbeYipZT73V6s/lihoQdYp5Eoy HOYw==
X-Received by 10.68.222.130 with SMTP id qm2mr19933221pbc.44.1420767423725; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:37:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <719d2a22-6c41-467c-a046-0a53704953c6@googlegroups.com>
References <71ecb9ec-5d8c-4503-a75b-1d4aeca79b08@googlegroups.com> <mailman.17484.1420745315.18130.python-list@python.org> <719d2a22-6c41-467c-a046-0a53704953c6@googlegroups.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date Thu, 8 Jan 2015 18:36:23 -0700
Subject Re: Can numpy do better than this?
To Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.17492.1420767434.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 19
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1420767434 news.xs4all.nl 2869 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38806
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:83382

Show key headers only | View raw


On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> wrote:
> With that I came up with the expression
>
> transpose(array([list(roll(mat[:,i],i,0)) for i in range(mat.shape[1])]))
>
> Not exactly pretty.
> My hunch is it can be improved??...

Hmm, you could use the column_stack constructor to avoid having to
transpose the array.

>>> np.column_stack(np.roll(mat[:,i],i,0) for i in range(mat.shape[1]))
array([[ 1, 38, 33, 28, 23, 18],
       [ 7,  2, 39, 34, 29, 24],
       [13,  8,  3, 40, 35, 30],
       [19, 14,  9,  4, 41, 36],
       [25, 20, 15, 10,  5, 42],
       [31, 26, 21, 16, 11,  6],
       [37, 32, 27, 22, 17, 12]])

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Can numpy do better than this? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-01-08 09:56 -0800
  Re: Can numpy do better than this? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-01-08 12:27 -0700
    Re: Can numpy do better than this? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-01-08 17:13 -0800
      Re: Can numpy do better than this? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-01-08 17:19 -0800
      Re: Can numpy do better than this? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-01-08 18:36 -0700
        Re: Can numpy do better than this? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-01-08 17:45 -0800
  Re: Can numpy do better than this? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2015-01-11 04:12 +0000

csiph-web