Re: in search of graceful co-routines

References	<4DD2AA99.3010508@simplistix.co.uk> <BANLkTin228brtPfuRrsEqscO1015gVKCTw@mail.gmail.com> <4DD358B3.2060308@simplistix.co.uk>
From	Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date	2011-05-17 23:46 -0600
Subject	Re: in search of graceful co-routines
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1741.1305697618.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
> Yes, but it's this kind of birds nest I'm trying to avoid...

I was actually kind of hoping you might see it that way.  That's about
as simple as you're going to get using a generator for this, though.
I'll second Terry's suggestion on this:  forget using a generator for
the provider, and instead create an iterator class with regular
methods to decouple the push logic from the pull logic.  I think
you'll be glad that you did.

Cheers,
Ian

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: in search of graceful co-routines Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 23:46 -0600

csiph-web