Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #30649
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.035 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'python': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:mail-vc0-f174.google.com': 0.09; 'language': 0.14; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'subject:sub': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'trying': 0.21; 'bit': 0.21; "i've": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'am,': 0.27; 'besides': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'post': 0.28; 'pile': 0.29; 'received:209.85.220.174': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'not.': 0.32; 'certain': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'add': 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'talk': 0.38; 'several': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'days': 0.60; 'back': 0.62; 'worth': 0.63; 'bot': 0.84; 'coupled': 0.84; 'convinced': 0.93 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RHlBRU5gdQrLP9HsVwqwFbtDMOTsld1Z8H4/Z+RC4xU=; b=Ua69QePp8o6kZ7teSFL6eC66i6owW83RLdGu5LEe5B0mvXx1CP094yjV001XvjMm1N 8qDpuj+OlVlBQfa8yVkowT7Oi7lZz9wFJ3jNUAP/6qeit2HdmYwo0iztHWQF2q8n68N9 9ecsaroKVHNMl6aA3bLAtqMtAIc4e6UuRYc+hJzw8aqXNVz1hhcOnDN8GI98C+N0jRuF LuNNhT9lQE4SyzrkePKdxn08GLLuC/ZD/vqPpV/PimD3MWUQ3c9axmexMhzwhikW/Icb qsDqwOtbfoO/522MAkQtJwRc0yNndQubaFocJ5Di2HY2RRHzufmTNbntlFtKN4RhDNSs U1Ww== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <k4f5h2$cs8$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| References | <mailman.1636.1348935354.27098.python-list@python.org> <040cf4f0-e6de-45b1-add4-462c02fc2c7f@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1700.1349079470.27098.python-list@python.org> <e895bf8b-514b-4dc2-a43e-50de4f9c3a9e@googlegroups.com> <k4f5h2$cs8$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Date | Wed, 3 Oct 2012 03:58:02 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1737.1349200685.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 17 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1349200685 news.xs4all.nl 6871 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38432 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:30649 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > What happened to freedom of speech? If I want to talk to a bot, I'll talk > to a bot. Besides I'm not convinced it/he/she is a bot. Plus if you read > my post carefully, add in several years experience of Python the language > and Python the comedy, you might come to the conclusion that a certain > amount of urine extraction was going on :) Coupled with a bit of bot-seeding, which is always fun. One of these days I'm going to mail Dihedral a whole pile of Gilbert and Sullivan operetta and see if any of it comes back in his posts... Dihedral might be a bot and might not. I've come to the conclusion that it's not worth trying to find out, given that a good bot can outdo a lot of humans in useful conversation. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Thomas Bach <thbach@students.uni-mainz.de> - 2012-09-29 18:14 +0200
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-29 09:26 -0700
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Thomas Bach <thbach@students.uni-mainz.de> - 2012-09-29 18:44 +0200
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-30 17:58 -0700
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-01 09:19 +0100
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 09:12 -0700
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-02 17:44 +0100
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 20:21 -0700
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 20:21 -0700
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-03 03:58 +1000
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-03 00:57 +0000
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-02 18:11 -0700
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-03 01:24 +0000
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-02 18:42 -0700
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-02 19:35 +0100
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-10-02 14:59 -0400
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 09:12 -0700
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-02 13:54 -0700
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-02 13:54 -0700
Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-30 17:58 -0700
csiph-web