Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #57806

how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.003
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'subject:same': 0.07; 'e.g.,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'reformat': 0.09; 'rewrite': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'advice:': 0.16; 'elem': 0.16; 'iterable,': 0.16; 'iterable:': 0.16; 'message-id:@post.gmane.org': 0.16; 'of)': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'elements': 0.16; 'subject: ?': 0.16; 'all,': 0.19; 'passing': 0.19; 'code,': 0.22; 'example': 0.22; 'programming': 0.22; 'this?': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'earlier': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'question': 0.24; 'define': 0.26; 'somewhere': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'generally': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'received:132': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'becomes': 0.33; 'subject:the': 0.34; "i'd": 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'thanks': 0.36; 'checks': 0.38; 'depends': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'help,': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'skip:p 20': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'solve': 0.60; 'simple': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'information': 0.63; 'kind': 0.63; 'skip:n 10': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'chance': 0.65; 'dear': 0.65; 'as:': 0.81; 'recurring': 0.91; 'imagine': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de>
Subject how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ?
Date Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:50:19 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host sea.gmane.org
User-Agent Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP 132.230.1.27 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0)
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1693.1382953842.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 52
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1382953842 news.xs4all.nl 15922 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40608
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:57806

Show key headers only | View raw


Dear all,
this is a recurring programming problem that I'm just not sure how to solve
optimally, so I thought I'd ask for your advice:
imagine you have a flag set somewhere earlier in your code, e.g.,

needs_processing = True

then in a for loop you're processing the elements of an iterable, but the
kind of processing depends on the flag, e.g.,:

for elem in iterable:
    if needs_processing:
        pre_process(elem)  # reformat elem in place
    print(elem)

this checks the condition every time through the for loop, even though there
is no chance for needs_processing to change inside the loop, which does not
look very efficient. Of course, you could rewrite the above as:

if needs_processing:
    for elem in iterable:
        pre_process(elem)  # reformat elem in place
        print(elem)
else:
    for elem in iterable:
        print(elem)

but this means unnecessary code-duplication.

You could also define functions (or class methods):
def pre_process_and_print (item):
    pre_process(item)
    print(item)

def raw_print (item):
    print(item)

then:
process = pre_process_and_print if needs_processing else raw_print
for elem in iterable:
    process(elem)

but while this works for the simple example here, it becomes complicated if
pre_process requires more information to do its job because then you will
have to start passing around (potentially lots of) arguments.

So my question is: is there an agreed-upon generally best way of dealing
with this?

Thanks for your help,
Wolfgang

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2013-10-28 09:50 +0000
  Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-28 11:14 +0000
    Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 22:18 +1100
      Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-29 04:51 +0000
  Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Piet van Oostrum <piet@vanoostrum.org> - 2013-10-28 14:31 -0400
  Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-10-28 19:37 +0000
    Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-10-29 13:44 +0000
      Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-10-29 09:13 -0700
  Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 23:14 -0700
    Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-29 17:39 +1100
  Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 23:53 -0700
    Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-29 18:09 +1100
  Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-29 16:55 -0700
  Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-10-30 11:38 +1000
  Re: how to avoid checking the same condition repeatedly ? Mariano Anaya <marianoanaya@gmail.com> - 2013-10-30 06:34 -0700

csiph-web