Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #38722

Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.035
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'input,': 0.09; 'namespace': 0.09; 'propagate': 0.09; 'subject:while': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'sat,': 0.15; 'compile,': 0.16; 'exists?': 0.16; 'identifiers': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'feb': 0.19; 'module': 0.19; 'bit': 0.21; 'defined': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; '(you': 0.23; 'monday,': 0.23; 'statement': 0.23; 'this:': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'fit': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'question': 0.27; 'chris': 0.28; 'oop': 0.29; 'types.': 0.29; 'array': 0.29; 'definition': 0.29; 'objects': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'function': 0.30; 'sense': 0.31; 'johnson': 0.32; '11,': 0.33; 'function.': 0.33; 'knowledge': 0.33; 'languages': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'dir': 0.35; 'sequence': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; "wasn't": 0.36; 'method': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'rather': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'object': 0.38; 'where': 0.40; 'help': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'include:': 0.61; 'kind': 0.61; 'more': 0.63; 'decided': 0.65; 'sum': 0.66; 'capital': 0.68; 'special': 0.73; '100%': 0.76; '/only/': 0.84; '2013': 0.84; 'on?': 0.91; 'rick': 0.91; 'yes!': 0.93
X-Received by 10.49.98.42 with SMTP id ef10mr1199753qeb.15.1360643081955; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:24:41 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Date Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:24:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <mailman.1650.1360590746.2939.python-list@python.org>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.196.64.201; posting-account=h3aEwQoAAACiuqX-oR3gvCVFm8lLHoWj
References <mailman.2132.1342341291.4697.python-list@python.org> <5002a1f9$0$29995$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2141.1342369188.4697.python-list@python.org> <7b027612-a07e-40f9-8ad2-3e95c5440482@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2148.1342375350.4697.python-list@python.org> <bbc44546-ffb7-4ff9-bd43-3bfa068df75f@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2154.1342389192.4697.python-list@python.org> <86872ad2-fda0-403b-9f18-d1cb18e41860@t32g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmov--b_s5e=OYsWWV8w6byj5a+28NNu-vRWGV8mr8w5cg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2159.1342404957.4697.python-list@python.org> <50039290$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2197.1342498752.4697.python-list@python.org> <9309333c-13a0-464c-bd94-9c682363b8c9@googlegroups.com> <511516db$0$29969$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <ee71b775-b527-4bb3-a080-12aad962b0ba@googlegroups.com> <62c3e7bb-d023-43b4-b759-f424707fd346@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1521.1360368357.2939.python-list@python.org> <75c82449-773e-4077-a6c9-e9cef08f845f@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1526.1360372655.2939.python-list@python.org> <51fdb504-9969-4bff-b1dc-32e231beecd4@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1573.1360472685.2939.python-list@python.org> <04856796-18ef-42e9-b7e9-66354475a78f@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1643.1360587006.2939.python-list@python.org> <d26985ed-7300-481c-a596-1e35091ce522@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1650.1360590746.2939.python-list@python.org>
User-Agent G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client true
X-Google-IP 70.196.64.201
MIME-Version 1.0
Subject Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements
From Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com>
To comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Message-ID <mailman.1680.1360643090.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 30
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1360643090 news.xs4all.nl 6953 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57353
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:38722

Show key headers only | View raw

On Monday, February 11, 2013 7:52:24 AM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
> [...]
> But my statement wasn't based on my own knowledge of the stdlib, but
> rather on this:
> 
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Rick Johnson wrote:
> > I'm a bit unnerved by the sum function. Summing a
> > sequence only makes sense if the sequence in question
> > contains /only/ numeric types. For that reason i decided
> > to create a special type for holding Numerics.
> 
> Why create a special type if it already exists?

Because at the time i made this statement we were discussing 100% true OOP (you know, the kind of paradigm where object definition identifiers start with a capital letter? *estoeric-wink*), but more importantly because i don't find the current implementation of array and list to be consistent.

> Yep. By the way, how does the help function fit into your wonderfully
> OOP model? What's it a method on?

Well since /all/ objects will have help available it should be defined Object#help and then propagate downwards. But even true OOP languages need a few global functions... *gasp*... oh yes! A few that come to mind include:

 globals, locals, vars, compile, eval, exec, input, print, dir
 
And don't forget, we still have module namespace to deal with!

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 22:16 -0800
  Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 23:27 -0700
    Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 22:32 -0800
    Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 22:32 -0800
  Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-09 02:16 +1100
    Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 09:48 -0800
      Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-02-08 12:58 -0500
      Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 11:58 -0800
        Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 11:05 +1100
          Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 16:49 -0800
            Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 12:17 +1100
              Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:54 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 16:04 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 04:28 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 23:50 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 05:28 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 00:52 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:24 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:24 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 05:28 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 04:28 -0800
              Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:54 -0800
            Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 18:29 -0700
            Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 16:01 +1100
              Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:26 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 15:50 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 18:09 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 18:09 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-10 22:37 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-02-10 09:45 -0500
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2013-02-10 18:06 +0100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 04:18 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 23:40 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 05:13 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 00:35 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:00 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:00 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-11 17:06 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 16:55 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 09:48 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-13 08:24 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-12 18:43 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-12 18:43 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-15 13:12 -0700
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-16 11:12 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 09:48 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-11 17:06 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 05:13 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-02-15 21:09 +0200
              Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:26 -0800
          Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 16:49 -0800
        Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 18:06 -0700
          Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 22:25 -0800
          Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 22:25 -0800
      Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-09 14:16 +1100
        Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-09 15:36 -0500
      Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 21:12 -0800

csiph-web