Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #5574

Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.85.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.012
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.05; 'arguments': 0.05; '"""': 0.09; 'recursion': 0.09; 'c++': 0.12; 'def': 0.13; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'fibonacci': 0.16; 'recursive': 0.16; 'rewrote': 0.16; 'algorithm': 0.16; 'tue,': 0.20; 'discussion': 0.20; 'cheers,': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; '\xa0if': 0.23; 'received:209.85.161.46': 0.26; 'received :mail-fx0-f46.google.com': 0.26; 'function': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'looks': 0.28; 'thanks': 0.29; 'noticed': 0.29; 'received:209.85.161': 0.29; 'discussed': 0.29; '17,': 0.31; 'trick': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; "i've": 0.33; 'page': 0.33; 'there': 0.35; 'couple': 0.35; 'put': 0.35; 'some': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'faster': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'skip:" 20': 0.38; '8bit%:6': 0.39; 'it!': 0.39; 'set': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'where': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'how': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; 'vol': 0.60; '2011': 0.62; 'easy.': 0.68; 'formula': 0.84; 'knuth': 0.84; 'look.': 0.93
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YwEj+ffQri7PZ5PYvWGATlRxZBLaCWxWGUsrRkjCN30=; b=kzoXx1n+LAlBhp2s26ygCktpTo0yBx+mV4Qz/4ohHBILTbqDcw2O6SlQIDCpccewjG tUe+sJZ/Dq6rj9uiAHdggscSC7102xCCceShxVDPrBXRHAdNX6PiUiJOh2fbSTO1v3vU EaEISQ7SnelNcbKEp4ZQbiYq03IwASKdv80tg=
DomainKey-Signature a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NSC4cat6WzQ8s0Rs6OkprRm8q5viPOV4e8TKGfgDLb1Z20DkuKZ2oLg204hsVgaKng uDr0Uwj8mnHdyoVkB5Kb5nIx8Ha7t9IZWJn+h0A3ckrTxitrhpMCpmMcKvsqSdj4tK9j Gi+xrmHSl7N1K7/vM4nPdl60VDBJvoOqcvpEA=
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <108ce447-10fa-4cf7-84ef-440ee18dbfd4@22g2000prx.googlegroups.com>
References <108ce447-10fa-4cf7-84ef-440ee18dbfd4@22g2000prx.googlegroups.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date Tue, 17 May 2011 10:23:48 -0600
Subject Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers
To Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1678.1305649459.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 42
NNTP-Posting-Host 82.94.164.166
X-Trace 1305649459 news.xs4all.nl 49183 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:40595
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:5574

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:50 AM, RJB <rbotting@csusb.edu> wrote:
> I noticed some discussion of recursion..... the trick is to find a
> formula where the arguments are divided, not decremented.
> I've had a "divide-and-conquer" recursion for the Fibonacci numbers
> for a couple of years in C++ but just for fun rewrote it
> in Python.  It was easy.  Enjoy.  And tell me how I can improve it!
>
> def fibo(n):
>        """A Faster recursive Fibonaci function
> Use a formula from Knuth Vol 1 page 80, section 1.2.8:
>           If F[n] is the n'th Fibonaci number then
>                   F[n+m] = F[m]*F[n+1] + F[m-1]*F[n].
>  First set m = n+1
>   F[ 2*n+1 ] = F[n+1]**2 + F[n]*2.
>
>  Then put m = n in Knuth's formula,
>           F[ 2*n ] = F[n]*F[n+1] + F[n-1]* F[n],
>   and replace F[n+1] by F[n]+F[n-1],
>           F[ 2*n ] = F[n]*(F[n] + 2*F[n-1]).
> """
>        if n<=0:
>                return 0
>        elif n<=2:
>                return 1
>        elif n%2==0:
>                half=n//2
>                f1=fibo(half)
>                f2=fibo(half-1)
>                return f1*(f1+2*f2)
>        else:
>                nearhalf=(n-1)//2
>                f1=fibo(nearhalf+1)
>                f2=fibo(nearhalf)
>                return f1*f1 + f2*f2

Thanks for posting!  Actually, it looks like this is the same O(n)
algorithm that rusi posted.  There was also a O(log n) algorithm
discussed that is based on vector math.  You might want to take a
look.

Cheers,
Ian

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers RJB <rbotting@csusb.edu> - 2011-05-17 08:50 -0700
  Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 10:23 -0600
  Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 09:25 -0700
  Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 09:36 -0700
    Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 10:02 -0700
      Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2011-05-17 20:19 +0300
        Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 11:56 -0700
          Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Wolfram Hinderer <wolfram.hinderer@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-17 14:04 -0700
            Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 14:59 -0700
            Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 21:43 -0700
      Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-19 22:47 +0000
        Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 09:37 +1000
          Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-20 05:58 +0000
            Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 16:06 +1000
              Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-20 01:26 -0500
                Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 16:54 +1000
                Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-20 17:07 +0000
                Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 11:43 -0700
                Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-21 10:44 +1000
              Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-05-21 20:49 +1200
            Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 01:26 -0600
            Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 01:32 -0600
              Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers SigmundV <sigmundv@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 03:53 -0700
        Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 17:03 -0700
  Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> - 2011-05-24 16:44 -0700

csiph-web