Re: Writing a blog post on the new Enum.

References	<CAA=1kxQxcGpDzR6VDEb1urjjn4bnRvi4aoXKKa5+vgG186hzOg@mail.gmail.com> <519172C3.4030108@stoneleaf.us> <CAA=1kxSHKjoTYZZ7Gs_Tpo+h3hRVQRb0p8aeEnnKuXf9jWA4cA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmpK2yRbDxy5SZQXvRi3dH0UGSmihNU4NJcpu_DY7A=+1g@mail.gmail.com> <kmtjvu$kb9$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date	2013-05-15 01:36 +1000
Subject	Re: Writing a blog post on the new Enum.
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1673.1368545802.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
> On 5/14/2013 3:52 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>
>>> http://fabiosantoscode.blogspot.pt/2013/05/pythons-new-enum-class.html
>>
>>
>>      class Text(unicode, Enum):
>>          one = u'one'
>>          two = u'two'
>>          three = u'three'
>
>
> Is this supposed to be a quote? or your rewrite? or did Santos rewrite after
> you posted? The blog currently has a 3.x version of that.

It was a quote from the blog post as it had been when I posted it.
Presumably he edited the post subsequently, as I'm now seeing the same
thing you are, a 3.x-compat version. (The u'xx' prefixes wouldn't be a
problem, incidentally, so this could be dual-versionned just by going
"unicode = str".)

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Writing a blog post on the new Enum. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-15 01:36 +1000

csiph-web