Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #57776
| References | (2 earlier) <CAPTjJmqVz8PidbbjXbSn=6M42m=LZg3JBh1mKQr7-FuiqzbOUQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1637.1382848122.18130.python-list@python.org> <bd3ve5F6cjjU1@mid.individual.net> <CALwzidkXgAkkmE=Z=oxAXppUcKnudSQU9VcdFMRo26PEjmoXjg@mail.gmail.com> <7w7gcy9tpk.fsf@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-28 10:58 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: How to find where data files are installed for my Python program |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1672.1382918324.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > It is an unfortunate artefact of Unix history that “binary” has an > established connotation of “executable”, encompassing even executable > text files. That's a lot broader than Unix - people talk about "binaries" meaning executables in Windows and OS/2 too. Unix is, if anything, _less_ inclined that way - the executable segment is called "text", which always struck me as a bit odd. > So the separation I'm drawing attention to in the FHS has nothing to do > with whether the files are text files, and everything to do with whether > they're executable programs and code libraries. Yup. Unix does a fairly good job of blurring the line between "executables that can be loaded and jumped to" and "scripts that get loaded by an interpreter". I actually have a few scripts that take several levels of interpreter, something like: foo.pike #!/usr/local/bin/pike bar.pike: #!/.../foo.pike --parameter fum.pike: #!/.../bar.pike --otherparameter Unix will happily execute ./fum.pike as "/usr/local/bin/pike /.../foo.pike --parameter /.../bar.pike --otherparameter ./fum.pike". There's a limit on the number of interpreters (to prevent loops), but I haven't hit it :) There is one important place, though, where scripts are called data files, and that's licensing. The GPL, for instance, does NOT cover your scripts, even if it covers the interpreter, because *to the language interpreter*, your scripts are just data files. But that's more of a legal distinction than a filesystem hierarchical one. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Function for the path of the script? Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-26 19:23 -0700
Re: Function for the path of the script? Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2013-10-26 21:42 -0500
Re: Function for the path of the script? Gary Herron <gary.herron@islandtraining.com> - 2013-10-26 19:52 -0700
Re: Function for the path of the script? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-27 14:01 +1100
Re: Function for the path of the script? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-28 14:49 +0000
Re: Function for the path of the script? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-29 01:59 +1100
Re: Function for the path of the script? rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-10-28 21:00 -0700
Re: Function for the path of the script? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-29 05:27 +0000
Re: Function for the path of the script? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-29 14:31 +0000
Re: Function for the path of the script? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-27 03:42 +0000
Re: Function for the path of the script? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-10-27 15:10 +1100
Re: Function for the path of the script? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-27 09:38 -0400
Re: Function for the path of the script? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-28 14:58 +0000
Re: Function for the path of the script? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-10-29 09:50 +1100
Re: Function for the path of the script? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-29 14:26 +0000
How to find where data files are installed for my Python program (was: Function for the path of the script?) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-10-27 15:28 +1100
Re: How to find where data files are installed for my Python program (was: Function for the path of the script?) rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-10-26 22:18 -0700
Re: How to find where data files are installed for my Python program Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-10-27 20:58 +1300
Re: How to find where data files are installed for my Python program Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-10-27 09:50 -0600
Re: How to find where data files are installed for my Python program Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-10-28 10:13 +1100
Re: How to find where data files are installed for my Python program Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-10-28 10:31 +1100
Re: How to find where data files are installed for my Python program Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 10:58 +1100
Re: How to find where data files are installed for my Python program Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-10-28 00:34 +0000
Re: How to find where data files are installed for my Python program Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 17:51 +1100
Re: How to find where data files are installed for my Python program Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-28 08:51 -0400
Re: How to find where data files are installed for my Python program Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-29 00:06 +1100
Re: How to find where data files are installed for my Python program (was: Function for the path of the script?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-27 16:49 +1100
Re: Function for the path of the script? Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 15:57 -0700
Re: Function for the path of the script? Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 22:56 -0700
csiph-web