Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #38709
| References | (1 earlier) <mailman.1500.1360329332.2939.python-list@python.org> <kf3edb$1ar$1@reader1.panix.com> <6lmdh8t7osnvjj5v5vnrav8q5anum6ln3q@4ax.com> <5116E168.6030707@gmail.com> <kf71b2$5ho$1@ger.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-11 15:46 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Is Python programming language? |
| From | Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1671.1360626382.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Sent from my android phone. On Feb 9, 2013 6:41 PM, "Terry Reedy" <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote: > > On 2/9/2013 6:53 PM, Michael Torrie wrote: >> >> On 02/09/2013 04:26 PM, Tim Roberts wrote: >>> >>> Most people would call bash a "scripting language", but it is also clearly >>> a programming language. It has syntax, variables and expressions. I >>> suspect it is Turing-complete, although I haven't seen a proof of that. >>> >>> I would assert that scripting languages are a proper subset of programming >>> languages, not a separate category. >> >> >> I'm pretty sure Bash is turing complete. I know it's been shown that >> sed is turing complete, and awk probably is too! If I recall, the way >> to show a language is turing complete is to implement a turing machine > > > If the language has arrays, conditional execution, and explicit (while) loops or recursion, you can be pretty sure it is Turing complete. I presume this covers awk and bash. Something like the game of Life, where the looping in implicit in the operation, is much harder to show Turing complete. I suspect sed is non-trivial also. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness For proving something Turing-complete, you only need to prove equivalence to some other Turing-complete language. The simplest test involves three things: 1. Sequential flow 2. An if, while or recursive function/method call 3. An arbitrary number of variables - arrays are optional Strictly speaking, no language on a real computer is fully Turing-complete, because real computers don't have an infinitely large memory, while TM's do. But it's common to handwaive past that part of the definition. > Terry Jan Reedy > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Is Python programming language? Stephane Wirtel <stephane@wirtel.be> - 2013-02-08 14:15 +0100
Re: Is Python programming language? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-02-08 17:59 +0000
Re: Is Python programming language? Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2013-02-09 15:26 -0800
Re: Is Python programming language? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 16:53 -0700
Re: Is Python programming language? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-02-09 21:40 -0500
Re: Is Python programming language? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-02-09 21:47 -0500
Re: Is Python programming language? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 19:55 -0700
Re: Is Python programming language? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 15:46 -0800
csiph-web